As you read this, consider what might happen if a splinter group, led by the EU, China, Canada and Russia evolves to form a “World ex-US” or “World ex-US and UK” group.
Well, in 1948 it was clear that Congress denied any WHO authority over US domestic affairs and it did not sign any agreement with the WHO.
These days> The order of the day is chaos and for all to act "ultra cires"!by all and subdry and let the courts catch up or not. The Democratic Prty wants the WHO to model itslef o US political structures, regulations an regulatory autorities,
""As you read this, consider what might happen if a splinter group, led by the EU, China, Canada and Russia evolves to form a “World ex-US” or “World ex-US and UK” group.""
Excluding Russia and including the UK, I postulate they already have ...
Russia doesn't pick my pocket
Does any legislation clearly remove US from the WHO or from any support there of?
And from the UN?
Well, in 1948 it was clear that Congress denied any WHO authority over US domestic affairs and it did not sign any agreement with the WHO.
These days> The order of the day is chaos and for all to act "ultra cires"!by all and subdry and let the courts catch up or not. The Democratic Prty wants the WHO to model itslef o US political structures, regulations an regulatory autorities,
""As you read this, consider what might happen if a splinter group, led by the EU, China, Canada and Russia evolves to form a “World ex-US” or “World ex-US and UK” group.""
Excluding Russia and including the UK, I postulate they already have ...
"The scary thought is that, even if the US does not agree, the Rest of the World might proceed without the US – to get dominated by China and Russia."
What's the difference?
Russia+China are not the threat so much as the UNagenda+ it's drivers of our world.
Bio-weapons arms race with secrets