According to Robert Barnes @vivabarneslaw.locals.com also @barnes_law on X: the religious exemption law is far more broadly applicable than for just “religious” people.
You might want to ask him to comment on X if you are interested.
"Religious exemption" means they can weed out anybody who doesn't have the intellect, the time, or the perseverence to navigate a painfully tedious and fickle bureaucratic process, where total strangers get to judge whether your religious convictions are genuine or not. F**k that. It's not even fair to religious people, it's just a fig leaf they can use to cover their legal bases.
I'm religious, and I could probably bulldoze my way through that process, but *I* think even atheists and arseholes should have a right to refuse, and nobody should have the power to reject that, based on their personal judgement of whether you're being "genuine" or not. Everything about that process is petty, stupid, and arbitrary, and has no place in law.
why isn’t this every individual's inalienable right to refuse an experimental injection?
It absolutely should be! I would guess that you and everyone reading your substack would agree. The government has no business mandating anything that will go into our bodies. Doing so is medical tyranny.
So Harris is running on the “my body my choice?”
Abortion like race, like income inequality, and climate change, are nothing more than tools in their Marxist toolbox.
P O W E R is their ultimate goal- always has been but now it’s much more obvious. How to awaken the comatose??!!🇺🇸
According to Robert Barnes @vivabarneslaw.locals.com also @barnes_law on X: the religious exemption law is far more broadly applicable than for just “religious” people.
You might want to ask him to comment on X if you are interested.
Exactly.
https://hillmd.substack.com/p/get-off-your-knees-seeking-covid
For real.
"Religious exemption" means they can weed out anybody who doesn't have the intellect, the time, or the perseverence to navigate a painfully tedious and fickle bureaucratic process, where total strangers get to judge whether your religious convictions are genuine or not. F**k that. It's not even fair to religious people, it's just a fig leaf they can use to cover their legal bases.
I'm religious, and I could probably bulldoze my way through that process, but *I* think even atheists and arseholes should have a right to refuse, and nobody should have the power to reject that, based on their personal judgement of whether you're being "genuine" or not. Everything about that process is petty, stupid, and arbitrary, and has no place in law.
Yarrow you have written a great post. Interlocutors aren't needed to try to know God. And for the atheists and the rest you are right there, too.
why isn’t this every individual's inalienable right to refuse an experimental injection?
It absolutely should be! I would guess that you and everyone reading your substack would agree. The government has no business mandating anything that will go into our bodies. Doing so is medical tyranny.