While we here hammer away in a virtually sealed silo, the New WEF State Disinformation Unit ensures almost no one perceives what is taking place in the former sovereign territories of New Zealand, Canada, or Australia. Just observe the 3 peaks above 30% weekly excess death (above the 2015 - 2019 mean) between 2022 - 2023 in your first graph ... (also seen on oced.stat data). This is not even seen in Australia, which tracks NZ excess deaths in perfect concordance since 2020.
It appears (and is lamentable) that almost no one is listening or even has the nous to pay attention, bar a very, very few. One lives in daily hope that this number may grow.
Thank you for the link, Peter. A TV media courted "debate" is hardly more than a marketing exercise, admittedly effective in this instance, although a lying NHS-GP is hardly demonstrated rebuttal, though it may be considered as media 'talking points.' The interviewer was unable to chair the set-piece discourse and the time allowed for the overall media sound-bite was egregious.
As you know, when one is running an uncontrolled experiment, a reference to "causality" becomes mute, while intentionally anchoring the fantasy of COVID in the mire of nonsense data readily enables conflation of COVID with VAX caused deaths, a predictable ploy. UK ONS "vaccine" "effectiveness" is only modeled (!) The authorities have used the designation with/off COVID since the beginning, one that is intentionally designed to bear a very high degree of causal uncertainty. The UK MP alludes to Australia but fails to mention New Zealand as that place was pre-jabbed en masse EVER BEFORE "cases" became a thing.
And the reference to a "deadly" COVID disease is beyond laughable. The WHO definition is as designed to be as clinically non-specific as is possible, while the IFR rate is < than seasonal flu.
As I mentioned above, "It appears (and is lamentable) that almost no one is listening or even has the nous to pay attention, bar a very, very few. One lives in daily hope that this number may grow."
There are signs - for example huge share price drops, record low uptake of ANY vaccine by pregnant women, entire US States banning mRNA - mandates or in general - and what is shaping up to be an almost zero uptake for the vaxx in the EU with sub 5% (compelled) vaxx uptake for the new monovalent in the US.
Thank you for this information, Peter, I'll be spreading this as much as possible. We all need to know the truth about these jabs - and that this is intent to kill, no doubts about it.
Doubt a worldwide mistake to target the elderly first (with so-called protection, for which there was no clinical trial data). This group places the largest economic burden on health care systems. If fewer people are employed to replace those retiring, then social systems in developed countries will crumble under expenditures going to aging boomers. Culling, indeed, looks like a plan.
If the governments won't play ball (they won't), then sue the individual person administering the "vaccine" and also the doctor overseeing it all.
A bit unfair, but it gets the court cases going and will hopefully open the entire can of worms, very, unavoidably publicly.
While we here hammer away in a virtually sealed silo, the New WEF State Disinformation Unit ensures almost no one perceives what is taking place in the former sovereign territories of New Zealand, Canada, or Australia. Just observe the 3 peaks above 30% weekly excess death (above the 2015 - 2019 mean) between 2022 - 2023 in your first graph ... (also seen on oced.stat data). This is not even seen in Australia, which tracks NZ excess deaths in perfect concordance since 2020.
It appears (and is lamentable) that almost no one is listening or even has the nous to pay attention, bar a very, very few. One lives in daily hope that this number may grow.
https://drlatusdextro.substack.com/p/excess-deaths-nzzzz-ozzzz-and-sweden
Here's what a member of the Cult NHS GP Dr. David Lloyd said to rebut MP Bridgen.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9xvDcr0CZBs
Thank you for the link, Peter. A TV media courted "debate" is hardly more than a marketing exercise, admittedly effective in this instance, although a lying NHS-GP is hardly demonstrated rebuttal, though it may be considered as media 'talking points.' The interviewer was unable to chair the set-piece discourse and the time allowed for the overall media sound-bite was egregious.
As you know, when one is running an uncontrolled experiment, a reference to "causality" becomes mute, while intentionally anchoring the fantasy of COVID in the mire of nonsense data readily enables conflation of COVID with VAX caused deaths, a predictable ploy. UK ONS "vaccine" "effectiveness" is only modeled (!) The authorities have used the designation with/off COVID since the beginning, one that is intentionally designed to bear a very high degree of causal uncertainty. The UK MP alludes to Australia but fails to mention New Zealand as that place was pre-jabbed en masse EVER BEFORE "cases" became a thing.
And the reference to a "deadly" COVID disease is beyond laughable. The WHO definition is as designed to be as clinically non-specific as is possible, while the IFR rate is < than seasonal flu.
As I mentioned above, "It appears (and is lamentable) that almost no one is listening or even has the nous to pay attention, bar a very, very few. One lives in daily hope that this number may grow."
We live in hope and we keep up the good work.
There are signs - for example huge share price drops, record low uptake of ANY vaccine by pregnant women, entire US States banning mRNA - mandates or in general - and what is shaping up to be an almost zero uptake for the vaxx in the EU with sub 5% (compelled) vaxx uptake for the new monovalent in the US.
Fingers crossed!
Thank you for this information, Peter, I'll be spreading this as much as possible. We all need to know the truth about these jabs - and that this is intent to kill, no doubts about it.
Doubt a worldwide mistake to target the elderly first (with so-called protection, for which there was no clinical trial data). This group places the largest economic burden on health care systems. If fewer people are employed to replace those retiring, then social systems in developed countries will crumble under expenditures going to aging boomers. Culling, indeed, looks like a plan.
Apparently there's going to be some sort of enquiry into this by new gov't (?). Would be interesting to have more details on the 30 people who died.