Share this discussion
Could it be that the adverse events from injections have been caused by incorrect administration of the doses? Dr John Campbell talks with Marc Girardot about the bolus that forms from NOT aspirating
peterhalligan.substack.com
|
© 2024 Peter Halligan
Substack is the home for great culture
In the first instance, the topographic variation of clot shot destination (ie. courtesy of an arteriole, venule, or lymphatic via subcutaneous adipose tissue, muscle, or interposed loose connective or a fascial plane tissue does not mitigate the terrible list of adverse events already described by Pfizer in Appendix 1 of its 6 mo report. (BNT162b2. 5.3.6 Cumulative Analysis of Post-authorization Adverse Event Reports). The 40,000 or so participants of the 3rd phase trial (NEJM Dec 2020) all received perfectly delivered intra-muscular shots?....I think not, or should I write, 'prove it?' SInce then, the trial has not withstood detailed scrutiny. Negative risk benefit to outright fatality are the established consequences of the shots for a non-existent pathogen, and a plandemic of testing running on the dependent fumes of ridiculous RAT/PCR "tests" for a non-specific condition. It appears that habituation of the global populace to shots was the aim, and one that was a monumental "success" but which now seems likely to lead to a raft of increasingly obvious consequences that will quite possibly serve to expose the abhorrent tactics in play.
Yes. I view it as "adding insult to injury" rather than isolation of cause f adverse event as per C19 injections.
Another potential injury from the completion of the manufacturing process (from freezer to fridge to syringe to arm - with mal-administration possible at each step of the manufacturing and delivery .- (left out too long, ot defrosted properly, not shaken crrectly etc).
By the way, here is a link to the re-issued 5.3.6 reprt - not that much changed that I could see, just the addition of the number of doses shipped (not administered, shppd). Lafs mre were shipped than administered s the risk/benefit appears lower.
https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/reissue_5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf
.
Keep Climbing.
So Many Of The Medical Freedom Doctors
Have Indignantly Hung Themselves
From The Lowermost Branches
On The Tree Of Knowledge.
Casting Only Shadows.
.
~15:50 "These guys [big pharma] did a good job... It's safe if it's injected properly." C'est ça oui! Apart from that, this is an interesting subject so I'll keep listening. Amazing though that he's managed to write such a thick book on the subject. He also looks very hung over to me. Not a good look.
I will never believe the jabs were meant for anything good! So many have been seriously injured & killed. There is no safe way to inject poison, & if there were it would have been completely rejected.
Thugs in charge plotted for years to kill off millions of us, they have done so & continue on, unaccountable.
There will be a day of reckoning.
While Marc may have a valid point about injection protocol in general, arguing this point belies the concept of injecting something into a muscle to protect the body from a pathogen in a different body system is even remotely a good idea or of any benefit. It's not a good idea and it doesn't work, regardless of technique.
Discussion like Marc's simply continues to push the idea that vaccines could be good if only they were done right. NO!! One thing I have come to learn is the fundamental principal of vaccines is wrong and on its face can't work. Our bodies protect systems with barriers for good reason. To protect. Barriers stop things getting padt. The skin is a barrier to outside harms. The lung and intestinal barrier does the same job. The blood brain narrier, placental barrier. They are all there for a reason, to keep things in the right place. So, poke a sharp needle through the skin and no matter how 'carefully' you squeeze the junk out it's still putting stuff where it has no right to be, and with no valid purpose. Even if it generates antibodies measureable in the blood they do no good in the lu the lungs because the barrier there only allows gaseous exchange. With a respiratory infection the antibodies need to be air side of the barrier as that's where the problem is. That's why there are associated gut problems, it's basically the same set of tubing, just further down.
So yes, good injection protocol is great, but only applies to appropriate injections. These mmRNA crap shots and vaccines are not for for purpose.END OF.
Well put!
Silliest idea yet. As if the clotshots themselves are harmless?? LOL.
it sounds like, communism works great. the only problem is that it just hasn't been done right.
Girardot has been on that bandwagon for 3 years now. He won't let it go. The problem with his theory is it doesn't explain batch anomalies, doesn't explain how in Europe the further you were from the place the injections were manufactured the less lethal they were. If all the damage came from injecting into a blood vessel as Girardot believes, then there would be no "hot batches", there would be no differences between batches that were injected near the manufacturing plant versus those injected far away from the plant. Some people get an idea and just won't let go of it. Like Trump trumpeting the vaccines as being safe and effective for years after it became obvious that they are not safe and not effective!
I think his case is that the blus ADDS to the insults from the experimental ijections.
I'm rethinking what I said above, that his theory does not explain bad batches. But actually it could. There could be batches that are more lethal (more mRNA, more LNP's, neither of which have degraded, etc.) and for those batches it could be that MOST of the injuries come from inadvertently injecting into a blood vessel. In other words, regardless of bad batch/not so bad batch, the damage will be much worse if they don't check to make sure they didn't hit a blood vessel. There would still be damage, but it could be only a fraction (1/20 ?) of the damage the shots caused by not checking for this.
I would totally agree with that. the injections are poison, injecting into muscle is bad, but mainlining it into the blood stream is very very bad!
Whatever way they are injected, they are not safe or effective.
I just posted that interview and no matter the jab ingredients are a bioweapon not a vax of any kind. We have plenty of evidence to know this was deliberate!! Arrest all of them!!
Insult to (injection) injury!
Execute them.