About a year ago I noted comments from an Australian SubStacker that C19 shots were reducing the remaining life of those infected by around 10% per dose.
It's not proven that anyone can survive 10 years after an mRNA injection: https://www.bitchute.com/video/YtKz3UL72Y99/ The technology is decades old. It's a very elegant poison. All the animals in the animal trials died. The human trials were never published. Problems start to show up after 2 years. Strokes, blood clots, aneurisms, turbo cancers, heart diseases, organ failure, seizures, prion diseases, sudden death, autoimmune diseases, and destruction of the immune system.
The actual effect on life expectancy reported in the paper is much smaller than 37%, it's a few months, which is still bad but it's not 37%. For some reason, in the final published version of the paper, the authors really did add that sentence "The subjects vaccinated with two doses lost 37% of life expectancy..." etc which has got a lot of people concerned, but it's badly worded, and if you read it in context, the 37% is actually the difference between two quite small *losses* of life expectancy corresponding to the different death rates observed in the double vaxxed and unvaxxed groups over the two year study period. A bit further on in the text they extrapolate to see what that difference in the mortality rate would mean if we assume it continues for life, and the answer is that the life expectancy of the double-vaxxed group is reduced by 3.6 months relative to the unvaxxed. The double-vaxxed group were the worst affected group, likely because at least some of them stopped at two doses because of a vax injury. The COVID vaccines certainly don't come out well from this study, it provides no evidence that they saved any net lives at all.
This study is so depressing that I won't be sharing it with any target audience where I know of people who took the jabs. At this point belief that they will be okay and to not die when doctors tell them to might be good for them, though those sincerly willing to confront the betrayal might find healing modalities beyond the reach of Big Pharma's killing embrace. Thanks for the explanation on how life expectancy in population wide data is reached. I suppose if everybody of every age stopped dying for a few years we could reclaim what was lost even though those young and dead before their time won't come back. But at what point does the damage stop? Or are we entering a death spiral?
Revelation 14.
https://open.substack.com/pub/dianabarahona/p/we-did-a-ceremony-at-a-lodge-in-america?r=wn91x&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
It's not proven that anyone can survive 10 years after an mRNA injection: https://www.bitchute.com/video/YtKz3UL72Y99/ The technology is decades old. It's a very elegant poison. All the animals in the animal trials died. The human trials were never published. Problems start to show up after 2 years. Strokes, blood clots, aneurisms, turbo cancers, heart diseases, organ failure, seizures, prion diseases, sudden death, autoimmune diseases, and destruction of the immune system.
The actual effect on life expectancy reported in the paper is much smaller than 37%, it's a few months, which is still bad but it's not 37%. For some reason, in the final published version of the paper, the authors really did add that sentence "The subjects vaccinated with two doses lost 37% of life expectancy..." etc which has got a lot of people concerned, but it's badly worded, and if you read it in context, the 37% is actually the difference between two quite small *losses* of life expectancy corresponding to the different death rates observed in the double vaxxed and unvaxxed groups over the two year study period. A bit further on in the text they extrapolate to see what that difference in the mortality rate would mean if we assume it continues for life, and the answer is that the life expectancy of the double-vaxxed group is reduced by 3.6 months relative to the unvaxxed. The double-vaxxed group were the worst affected group, likely because at least some of them stopped at two doses because of a vax injury. The COVID vaccines certainly don't come out well from this study, it provides no evidence that they saved any net lives at all.
Well, that puts a different light on it. Thanks for actually reading the study and pointing that out.
Ape
This study is so depressing that I won't be sharing it with any target audience where I know of people who took the jabs. At this point belief that they will be okay and to not die when doctors tell them to might be good for them, though those sincerly willing to confront the betrayal might find healing modalities beyond the reach of Big Pharma's killing embrace. Thanks for the explanation on how life expectancy in population wide data is reached. I suppose if everybody of every age stopped dying for a few years we could reclaim what was lost even though those young and dead before their time won't come back. But at what point does the damage stop? Or are we entering a death spiral?
Any idea how many years kids who were vaxed lose?