18 Comments
User's avatar
Andy Bunting's avatar

Thanks PH. Excellent probe into the murk of the whole debacle.

Expand full comment
JAired's avatar

George Webb (georgewebb.substack.com and on Twitter @realgeorgewebb1) and Mark Kulacz on YT at Housatonic Live (Live2, Live3 -- depending on what's been censored) with an in-depth repository at housatonicITS.com are truly bringing the 'receipts' on the subject of Anthrax -- people, places, things -- in this case, bioweapons and how each presents on the puzzle wheel. Worthy additions to the information train. Highly recommend following.

Expand full comment
kerrylyn's avatar

Interesting analogies with cockpit protocols esp. re chain of command and deferring - or not, when necessary - to authority (which I believe actually rarely happens the way he describes). As for the whole operation somehow spiralling out of control, sorry, don't buy it. This crash was meticulously planned.

Expand full comment
Kathleen Janoski's avatar

I wouldn't recommend using Wikipedia as a link for Wuhan.

Anyone can write or change anything on Wikipedia.

Expand full comment
Mary Lou Longworth's avatar

Wikipedia is not a reliable source. Even a small junior

college I attended once said it was an unacceptable resource.

So many professionals have had their reputations trashed on Wikipedia

and are unable to edit to correct these lies. Wikipedia is a politically biased

source that only supports a particular narrative.

Expand full comment
Kathleen Janoski's avatar

Agree.

Expand full comment
kerrylyn's avatar

It would be bedlam if anyone could do that. It is not as easy as you think, esp. if the page is protected.

Expand full comment
Kathleen Janoski's avatar

And who protects the page?

Stew Peters, Alex Jones, and Natural News (Mike Adams) are pretty well dissed as conspiracy theorists and worse on Wikipedia.

Expand full comment
kerrylyn's avatar

If a page is protected you have to send edit request and your edits won't necessarily be accepted.

Expand full comment
Kathleen Janoski's avatar

So if Alex Jones or Stew Peters wants to correct erroneous and derogatory information about themselves on Wikipedia, then there is the possibility the edit won't be accepted?

How is that fair? How is that accurate?

So...how can a person trust the info on the website?

Expand full comment
kerrylyn's avatar

They are generally accurate on factual stuff but have an editorial position on controversial subjects which is ideologically left-wing/liberal although they didn't start out that way. Why does this surprise you?

Expand full comment
Kathleen Janoski's avatar

It doesn't surprise me.

That is why I would never use Wikipedia as a source or reference.

Expand full comment
Peter Halligan's avatar

I hear you, but the references are there

Expand full comment
kerrylyn's avatar

Hi Peter - maybe reply to Janoski aka Sweeney? I've done my best.

Expand full comment