George Webb (georgewebb.substack.com and on Twitter @realgeorgewebb1) and Mark Kulacz on YT at Housatonic Live (Live2, Live3 -- depending on what's been censored) with an in-depth repository at housatonicITS.com are truly bringing the 'receipts' on the subject of Anthrax -- people, places, things -- in this case, bioweapons and how each presents on the puzzle wheel. Worthy additions to the information train. Highly recommend following.
Interesting analogies with cockpit protocols esp. re chain of command and deferring - or not, when necessary - to authority (which I believe actually rarely happens the way he describes). As for the whole operation somehow spiralling out of control, sorry, don't buy it. This crash was meticulously planned.
So if Alex Jones or Stew Peters wants to correct erroneous and derogatory information about themselves on Wikipedia, then there is the possibility the edit won't be accepted?
How is that fair? How is that accurate?
So...how can a person trust the info on the website?
They are generally accurate on factual stuff but have an editorial position on controversial subjects which is ideologically left-wing/liberal although they didn't start out that way. Why does this surprise you?
Thanks PH. Excellent probe into the murk of the whole debacle.
Biden never signed the bill https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/3746
George Webb (georgewebb.substack.com and on Twitter @realgeorgewebb1) and Mark Kulacz on YT at Housatonic Live (Live2, Live3 -- depending on what's been censored) with an in-depth repository at housatonicITS.com are truly bringing the 'receipts' on the subject of Anthrax -- people, places, things -- in this case, bioweapons and how each presents on the puzzle wheel. Worthy additions to the information train. Highly recommend following.
Interesting analogies with cockpit protocols esp. re chain of command and deferring - or not, when necessary - to authority (which I believe actually rarely happens the way he describes). As for the whole operation somehow spiralling out of control, sorry, don't buy it. This crash was meticulously planned.
I wouldn't recommend using Wikipedia as a link for Wuhan.
Anyone can write or change anything on Wikipedia.
Wikipedia is not a reliable source. Even a small junior
college I attended once said it was an unacceptable resource.
So many professionals have had their reputations trashed on Wikipedia
and are unable to edit to correct these lies. Wikipedia is a politically biased
source that only supports a particular narrative.
Agree.
It would be bedlam if anyone could do that. It is not as easy as you think, esp. if the page is protected.
And who protects the page?
Stew Peters, Alex Jones, and Natural News (Mike Adams) are pretty well dissed as conspiracy theorists and worse on Wikipedia.
If a page is protected you have to send edit request and your edits won't necessarily be accepted.
So if Alex Jones or Stew Peters wants to correct erroneous and derogatory information about themselves on Wikipedia, then there is the possibility the edit won't be accepted?
How is that fair? How is that accurate?
So...how can a person trust the info on the website?
They are generally accurate on factual stuff but have an editorial position on controversial subjects which is ideologically left-wing/liberal although they didn't start out that way. Why does this surprise you?
It doesn't surprise me.
That is why I would never use Wikipedia as a source or reference.
I hear you, but the references are there
Hi Peter - maybe reply to Janoski aka Sweeney? I've done my best.