“Green Deal” – politicians who support any “green deal” – new or European - are a parasitic version of humanity whose objectives are and will destroy human lives and the planet
First off, in my view, chicken little eco-warriors running round in circles screeching “the sky is falling” pose an existential threat to humanity.
For me, the reaction they promulgate amongst normal, functioning human beings is replicated in the insect world.
From here:
The mere presence of parasites can have a negative effect on hosts - https://debuglies.com
“The mere presence of parasites can have a negative effect on hosts, according to new research by University of Alberta parasitologists. The study, led by U of A associate professor Lien Luong, examined the effects on fruit flies living among parasitic mites. It found that flies exposed to, but not infected by parasitic mites expend more energy, have a shorter lifespan, and produce fewer offspring than those that are not.”
Resonate with the psychology of C19 pandemic and “Climate Change”?
“The research illustrates a concept called the ecology of fear, and is one of the first studies to show this phenomenon at play in the relationship between parasites and host organisms.”
Proponents of “Green Deals” are parasites that instil fear in people, but go one step further and herd their victims into killing zones where they can feed at their leisure, until something like this results (different species and parasite):
You will have heard of the moves by the Dutch Government to buy out 3,300 farmers and ban them from farming in Europe – moves just sanctioned by the EU Commission.
Expose-news.com has an article here for details.
You might wonder how a government – or rather a temporary bunch of people that neither campaigned during with an election manifesto of evicting farmers, politicians who did not win a majority of votes, rather the largest minority of votes – would want to do such a thing or even if it was legal.
Well, here’s the thing. These sorts of moves have been in play for a long time. They are based on the virtue signalling of “faux science” that stems from an unelected EU Commission and of course, the United Nations.
Here’s the UN source for the easily rebutted “climate science” regarding nitrogen emissions of a certain kind (nitrogen makes up 78% of the air, oxygen another 21%. Argon <1% and trace gases like CO2, Methane and water vapour making up the balance. CO2 makes up 0.04% (400 parts per million) and methane is 0.00018% (218 parts per million).
Here is a link to a paper that shows the UN position:
From 2014 UNEP Year Book 2014: emerging issues in our global environment | UNEP - UN Environment Programme
Referenced here in 2019: UNEP Frontiers 2018/19 Chapter 4 The Nitrogen Fix
Referenced here in January 2023: UNEP Frontiers 2018/19 Chapter 4 The Nitrogen Fix
and here (also January 2023): Four reasons why the world needs to limit nitrogen pollution (unep.org)
The last link has this:
“Nitrogen is an abundant element in the Earth’s atmosphere. It makes the sky blue, forms the foundation of proteins in our bodies and helps make soils fertile. However, excess nitrogen in the environment in a reactive form – which comes from the use of synthetic fertilizers, the discharge of wastewater or the combustion of fossil fuels – is a hazard, polluting land, water and air. It also exacerbates climate change and depletes the ozone layer, which is finally recovering.”
Note the final point “the ozone layer, which is finally recovering.” The ozone layer is recovering WITHOUT any special measures!
Here is an EU position paper from 2019:
EUR-Lex - 52019DC0640 - EN - EUR-Lex (europa.eu)
Which has this in its introduction:
“.. The atmosphere is warming and the climate is changing with each passing year. One million of the eight million species on the planet are at risk of being lost. Forests and oceans are being polluted and destroyed. The European Green Deal is a response to these challenges. It is a new growth strategy that aims to transform the EU into a fair and prosperous society, with a modern, resource-efficient and competitive economy where there are no net emissions of greenhouse gases in 2050 and where economic growth is decoupled from resource use.”
Pretty words, signifying nothing that anyone will ever be accountable for or that will see milestones towards progress. The epitome of BS.
Here’s a little more background on the EU’s consultation process:
Nutrients: Commission seeks views on better management (europa.eu)
Which has this:
“Today, the Commission is launching a public consultation on an Integrated Nutrient Management Action Plan.The Action Plan, announced in the EU Biodiversity and Farm to Fork strategies, will help achieve the European Green Deal’s 2030 target of reducing nutrient losses by 50%, while ensuring no deterioration in soil fertility. The objective is to reduce fertiliser use by at least 20%. Farmers, industries, NGOs, citizens and other interested parties are invited to share their views on this action plan via an online consultation that runs until 26 August 2022.”
Note: the process is the punishment. Enquiring minds want to know which submissions were discussed, to what depth and with what process for determining “success or failure” of the submissions. I am betting the views submitted were filtered and inevitably ignored. Much like this:
Here is a link to the EU’s website describing the European Green Deal
A European Green Deal (europa.eu)
Which states:
“Climate change and environmental degradation are an existential threat to Europe and the world. To overcome these challenges, the European Green Deal will transform the EU into a modern, resource-efficient and competitive economy, ensuring:
no net emissions of greenhouse gases by 2050
economic growth decoupled from resource use
no person and no place left behind
The European Green Deal is also our lifeline out of the COVID-19 pandemic. One third of the €1.8 trillion investments from the NextGenerationEU Recovery Plan, and the EU’s seven-year budget will finance the European Green Deal.”
600 billion euros on a Recovery Plan in the EU seven year budget plan? That means taxes or redirected spending from health, education and welfare. It also means whatever loss of revenue that happens when they shut down those that stand in their way to achieve this SPENDING goal is not reflected in that budget. It is one half the story.
You will need to put on waders to get through this BS, entirely based on BS and virtue signalling.
I look at it this way. Even if these green chicken littles are correct in any of their “faux science”, ignoring the largest contributors to their psychological issues, is like living in a house (the planet) that develops a gas leak (China) and solves the problem by shutting down the house that does not have the gas leak, whilst not shutting off the gas and fixing the leak.
Check this out from the World Economic Forum no less!
Emissions targets: China set to beat its 2030 climate goals | World Economic Forum (weforum.org)
Check this out from a BBC article referencing a Rhodium report from 2019.
Report: China emissions exceed all developed nations combined - BBC News
China’s emissions were equal to the combined emissions of the US, EU, India and Russia in 2019. I doubt that this has changed much over the course of the C19 pandemic.
So, what has the US and its “climate czar” John Kerry been up to?
Well, funny you should ask, but Kerry’s State Department refuses to provide details of his private jet flights, 5 star hotel stays and expense accounts – all tax payer funded of course.
Is he operating outside the law and his remit?. What exactly has he been doing?
Aside from that, check out Senator Kennedy asking for straight answers from David Turk, Deputy Energy Secretary (skip to the 5 minute mark for the juicy bits) before asking what impact spending of, say, 50 trillion bucks would have on reducing the increase “plucked out of the air” by the debunked climate agenda of the “Green New Deal”.
Kennedy questions Turk, Hruby in Appropriations Subcommittee on Energy and Water - YouTube
ZeroHedge covered it here:
“As energy expert David Blackmon writes in the Daily Caller;
And there we have it. Americans are being asked to accept the force-feeding of an incredibly radical set of policies with a price tag that is unprecedented in global history to achieve a “carbon neutrality” goal, whose benefits are so nebulous, negligible and wholly reliant on the cooperative actions of other countries beyond U.S. control that they cannot be measured in any reliable way.
Instead, we are being told by senior political appointees forcing those policies into being that we should simply trust them because they think it is the right thing to do in their “heart of hearts.”
This is madness. For some context, $50 trillion is an amount that exceeds the gross domestic product of the U.S., China, India, Germany and Japan, combined. It is a number that drastically exceeds total U.S. national debt. It is more than 135 times the $369 billion in green energy subsidies contained in last year’s Orwellian-named Inflation Reduction Act (IRA).”
As Cernovich puts it:
Onwards!
Please upgrade to paid, or donate a coffee (I drink a lot of coffee) - “God Bless You!” if you can’t or don’t want to contribute. Coffee donations here: https://ko-fi.com/peterhalligan - Buying just one Ko-Fi a week for $3 is 50 bucks more than an annual $100 subscription!
Climate Chains
Thank PH. Green hypocrites full of shit. Prior to this scamdemic 90+% of folk couldn't be bothered to think about the other scams being foisted on a dumb, subservient & bone idle humanity.
Now with more folk really waking up. There is a tiny glimmer of hope that their evil will be exorcised.