Your Guess is spot on. Like anything offered to a crook they would find a way to use it to their advantage. I would add some requirements that went along with the donation to reduce a sentence. restrict it to non violent offenders. they must restrict blood flow to the Gentiles along with a vasectomy. and for the ones that used a weapon in their crime a lobotomy as a final restriction. these would only be offered to inmates with a sentence longer than twenty years. a year or even five would leave them diminished physicality. to donate they would need to be a non- smoker and non- drinker having no other ailments upon testing. again what we dont see is government using the laws to expand its powers. with small increments it would go from voluntary donation to mandatory donations that would spread to the average citizen. the pressure would come from the medical lobby that would want to increase their profits using transplants and removing people from long term life support. They would never be available to the general public. the costs being prohibitive would be the rich and famous that can afford them. ---------- I,Grampa
Voters in every country on earth need to wake the fcuk up.
The rsclown politicotards now running the democrapocys, are proving themselves time & time again, to be the real oxygen thieving, shitstains , that they truly are.
The problem comes when government is given power by laws that allow limited use of a condition for incarceration. it will be limited to non-violent offenders first but when laws are on the books they can be quietly changed without little notice. This is a favorite government practice. Need proof? Remember back when seat belts were first put in cars "as an option" well soon government mandated them for all cars. Love that word mandated. Now we saw the push to use them for safety of the citizens. Then laws were passed that required that they be used. Dont worry you wont be stopped for not using the seat belt. Then you could recieve a ticket if you were stopped for another violation. and now they stop you for not using it. They get the first law on the books and then change it little by little until it expands their powers and control. I can only Immagine how many organs will be donated to get themselves out of jail. I now ask just how many inmates will have organs clean enough to donate? Although when someone is loosing their life the diseases they could acquire from these organs would be a minor threat. The real threat would come from the felon now freed by government law. Is this any different than the criminal element that comes to us from our open border? The few organ recipients that loose their lives from these organs is small compared to the many that loose life and property from the illegals. The largest threat will come from government expansion of powers that could demand organs for lighter sentencing from the poor citizen finding themselves entangled within our legal system. Within my 80 years I have watched as government slowly seizes power and control it wants to rule not serve.------------ I, Grampa
On a related issue: organ donation after "brain death" 2018 (?) interview Dr Paul Byrne, neonatologist/pro-life activist ( https://lifeguardianfoundation.org/ ) on how brain death is defined, meaning of consciousness, pain he claims is suffered by brain-dead donors paralysed by drugs (thus unable to express pain) during organ extraction to facilitate procedure - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l7NgJJtJ-mI
Your Guess is spot on. Like anything offered to a crook they would find a way to use it to their advantage. I would add some requirements that went along with the donation to reduce a sentence. restrict it to non violent offenders. they must restrict blood flow to the Gentiles along with a vasectomy. and for the ones that used a weapon in their crime a lobotomy as a final restriction. these would only be offered to inmates with a sentence longer than twenty years. a year or even five would leave them diminished physicality. to donate they would need to be a non- smoker and non- drinker having no other ailments upon testing. again what we dont see is government using the laws to expand its powers. with small increments it would go from voluntary donation to mandatory donations that would spread to the average citizen. the pressure would come from the medical lobby that would want to increase their profits using transplants and removing people from long term life support. They would never be available to the general public. the costs being prohibitive would be the rich and famous that can afford them. ---------- I,Grampa
Yes. And with no history of a C19 infection or C19 injection.
Voters in every country on earth need to wake the fcuk up.
The rsclown politicotards now running the democrapocys, are proving themselves time & time again, to be the real oxygen thieving, shitstains , that they truly are.
The problem comes when government is given power by laws that allow limited use of a condition for incarceration. it will be limited to non-violent offenders first but when laws are on the books they can be quietly changed without little notice. This is a favorite government practice. Need proof? Remember back when seat belts were first put in cars "as an option" well soon government mandated them for all cars. Love that word mandated. Now we saw the push to use them for safety of the citizens. Then laws were passed that required that they be used. Dont worry you wont be stopped for not using the seat belt. Then you could recieve a ticket if you were stopped for another violation. and now they stop you for not using it. They get the first law on the books and then change it little by little until it expands their powers and control. I can only Immagine how many organs will be donated to get themselves out of jail. I now ask just how many inmates will have organs clean enough to donate? Although when someone is loosing their life the diseases they could acquire from these organs would be a minor threat. The real threat would come from the felon now freed by government law. Is this any different than the criminal element that comes to us from our open border? The few organ recipients that loose their lives from these organs is small compared to the many that loose life and property from the illegals. The largest threat will come from government expansion of powers that could demand organs for lighter sentencing from the poor citizen finding themselves entangled within our legal system. Within my 80 years I have watched as government slowly seizes power and control it wants to rule not serve.------------ I, Grampa
My guess would be that the felon, once released, would commit a crime to get the sold organ replaced. But that's just me...
On a related issue: organ donation after "brain death" 2018 (?) interview Dr Paul Byrne, neonatologist/pro-life activist ( https://lifeguardianfoundation.org/ ) on how brain death is defined, meaning of consciousness, pain he claims is suffered by brain-dead donors paralysed by drugs (thus unable to express pain) during organ extraction to facilitate procedure - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l7NgJJtJ-mI
Wow who would have thot the satanists would grow a halo?