13 Comments

This is good research and really hard to swallow.

Expand full comment

I've been using our world in data plus another website which gathers population wide mortality. Most countries covered are still very elevated. There's something weird in the data out of Israel though there 0-44 age range has averaged -70% excess mortality for almost three years. I'm baffled.

Expand full comment

Lying, or they pretended and took saline (I think the 1st guess is more likely).

Expand full comment

I have a feeling that billions of injections were so badly manufactured the active ingredients were inactivated - but some were contaminated and some had the lipid nanoparticles escape through the PEG coating..

Expand full comment

And now the numbers are completely different...

Expand full comment

This is something I was looking at in https://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx?queryid=104676 I'm super curious about the 0-44 query on Israel. Maybe its nitpicky but I do go over these charts sometimes...

Expand full comment

Looks very useful. Presents like a pig though! I will try and get familiar, thanks for the heads up.

At the moment, I just realized what the arrow buttons were for as I could only get to week 37 if I change the year to 2021!

Thanks again - do you think the OECD has better access and quality than the national bodies that are supposed to keep track of excess mortality and such? Putting it in one place is a great help (like worldometer and ourworldindata) - makes me wonder if, because they all have the same hymn sheet, the differences will be quality issues amongst the compilers - unless OECD has proprietary info others do not have

Expand full comment

OECD gets its data from member county gov'ts statistical agencies. Data for Australia, for example, would come from ABS - Australian Bureau of Statistics. I was not aware they collected health/mortality data. I think that might be relatively new.

Expand full comment

It's really off. See Israel's population wide mortality is elevated just like almost every other developed country on Earth. But somehow 0-44 year olds have not only been spared for three years straight, but they've experienced almost no deaths. Is there a data glitch? I would expect a pull forward perhaps but for younger populations for three straight years it makes no sense

Expand full comment

Well a data glitch is a possibility indeed. It is also possible that it was initially one and they decided to leave it that way. Could also be a very low probability occurrence of a massive number of failed batches being given to that group. But yea, w/e the case that group in particular is often the hardest hit.

I guess one other possibility (have no idea on this one) ... maybe they are eating something or taking something that protects them? O.o .... anyway I hope they get to the bottom of it.

Expand full comment

Why doesn’t the world use ivermectin and end the charade?

Expand full comment

Baffling. If it doesn't work and causes less harm than Tylenol and people want to use it as a prophylactic or early to mid-stage treatment if symptoms emerge, what is the big deal?

We do know that ivermectin acts as an antibiotic as well as against parasites. And we do know that EcoHealthAlliance (Daszak) and WHO said "no antibiotics" as they interfere with the injections - trouble is, the "testing" using RT-PCR is bogus and so people did NOT have C19 and were denied antibiotics because they (bogus) tested and then.. many died.

Expand full comment

Because all the death is the plan!

Expand full comment