Interesting discussion between Meryl Nass and James Corbett – the “end run” round the Constitution and procedures means the amendments to IHR 2005 due for a vote in May 2023 have no legitimacy
Interesting discussion between Meryl Nass and James Corbett – the “end run” round the Constitution and procedures means the amendments to IHR 2005 due for a vote in May 2023 have no legitimacy
From here: Is the WHO's House of Cards Collapsing? James Corbett + Dr. Meryl Nass (rumble.com) There is a lot of content in the one hour video. My three key take-ways were: 1. For the amendments to IHR 2005 – only a sun-committee with a Japanese chair agree the amendments – there was no vote of the 194 member assembly of the WHO’s governing body the World Health Assembly – so, unless there was a vote of the World Health Assembly to delegate authority to the sub-committee, the amendments have no legitimacy and cannot be voted on in May 2024.
Hoping and trying to cross my toes too that this news isn’t ‘hopium.’
Yeah. The tactic currently in play for these end runs is "silence = consent".
Imagine if that applied in life.
A performance with no applause = approval of the performance!