Far more accurate than any pre-election polls done;-)
My own research from the Pfizer data dump corroborates the "10%" (or more) rate of injury. No way to count the dead people though. They don't answer polls, and they were "excluded" from the Pfizer trials as they died, but never were mentioned in the final report as having been excluded. Instead, they used a word-salad in the report, claiming "Of the participants" we only excluded 1%. Those who dropped out after the 1st shot (those who REFUSED to take another) were never considered to be "participants".
But deep in their thousands of disorganized PDF files I hit the jackpot and found that well over 10% of the "enrollees" had dropped out AFTER being jabbed, but no follow up (reporting) was done on ANY of them. Pfizer just decided to pretend they were never "participants" (even though they HAD been jabbed) and they got ZERO mention in the final reports.
Well over 10% got jabbed and then IGNORED when they refused to participate any further.
Of 42,086 reports - 9,,000 outcomes were "Unknown"11,361 were "Not Recovered" and 19,582 were described as "Recovered/Recovering" - along with the 1,223 dead.
There has been no talk about the Under Reporting Factor in the post-marketing experience - was it also around 40? Meaning that 48,000 died and 1.6 million were injured?
Lastly, note the number of doses were reported as "shipped" = 126 million bears on page 6. This was the reason for the revision which had previously been censored for commercial reasons.
Slide the cursor over to the left to get to 29 February 2021 doses by manufacturer and then to Pfizer.
The point is that 42,000 out of 126 million looks a lot safer than 42,000 out of 65 million, right?
Now combine that with an adjustment for the URF, and, instead of 42,000 events from 126 million doses and 1,223 deaths - you get 1.6 million events from 65 million doses and 48,000 deaths.
As with the clinical trials there is no reporting of any follow-ups after the end of the post-marketing report.
"Adverse events from vaccines are common but underreported, with LESS THAN ONE PERCENT reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Low reporting rates preclude or delay the identification of "problem" vaccines, potentially endangering the health of the public. " (Emphasis added.)
This means any rational "scientist" would FIRST calibrate by multiplying the VAERS numbers by at least 100 times before trying to go any further. And let's not forget the new CDC directive to all of the hospitals when they rolled out the warp speed death jabs. They ordered the hospitals to report jabbed people (who showed up dying from their injuries) as "unvaccinated" if they'd only received their first jab, and/or it was less than 14 days since their 2nd jab. When your hospital chart says "unvaccinated" your injuries are NOT going to be reported to VAERS.
And on top of all of this, VAERS will not take a report if the injury is not diagnosed within 30 days of the jab anyway. They have never studied ANY vaccine for LONG-TERM health impact. The entire system is specifically engineered to ASSURE over 99% of the injuries and deaths will never be reported. VAERS launders the dead bodies so that that the money made off of them won't need to be laundered.
Far more accurate than any pre-election polls done;-)
My own research from the Pfizer data dump corroborates the "10%" (or more) rate of injury. No way to count the dead people though. They don't answer polls, and they were "excluded" from the Pfizer trials as they died, but never were mentioned in the final report as having been excluded. Instead, they used a word-salad in the report, claiming "Of the participants" we only excluded 1%. Those who dropped out after the 1st shot (those who REFUSED to take another) were never considered to be "participants".
But deep in their thousands of disorganized PDF files I hit the jackpot and found that well over 10% of the "enrollees" had dropped out AFTER being jabbed, but no follow up (reporting) was done on ANY of them. Pfizer just decided to pretend they were never "participants" (even though they HAD been jabbed) and they got ZERO mention in the final reports.
Well over 10% got jabbed and then IGNORED when they refused to participate any further.
Good work.
The same applies to the revised post marketing docs for the 2.5 months from mid December 2020 to end February 2021
https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/reissue_5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf
page 7 of 38.
Of 42,086 reports - 9,,000 outcomes were "Unknown"11,361 were "Not Recovered" and 19,582 were described as "Recovered/Recovering" - along with the 1,223 dead.
There has been no talk about the Under Reporting Factor in the post-marketing experience - was it also around 40? Meaning that 48,000 died and 1.6 million were injured?
Lastly, note the number of doses were reported as "shipped" = 126 million bears on page 6. This was the reason for the revision which had previously been censored for commercial reasons.
The number shipped is not the same as the number of doses administered. Most Pfizer doses went to the EU and US. These summed to just 65 million see here and here https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/covid-vaccine-doses-by-manufacturer?country=~European+Union https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/covid-vaccine-doses-by-manufacturer?country=~USA
Slide the cursor over to the left to get to 29 February 2021 doses by manufacturer and then to Pfizer.
The point is that 42,000 out of 126 million looks a lot safer than 42,000 out of 65 million, right?
Now combine that with an adjustment for the URF, and, instead of 42,000 events from 126 million doses and 1,223 deaths - you get 1.6 million events from 65 million doses and 48,000 deaths.
As with the clinical trials there is no reporting of any follow-ups after the end of the post-marketing report.
If you're gleaning from the VAERS, one must consider that VAERS has been proven to report "less than 1%" of the ACTUAL injuries and deaths shortly after vaccination. SEE: https://digital.ahrq.gov/ahrq-funded-projects/electronic-support-public-health-vaccine-adverse-event-reporting-system - This study has never been refuted, and the reporting rates only got WORSE after it was done.
"Adverse events from vaccines are common but underreported, with LESS THAN ONE PERCENT reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Low reporting rates preclude or delay the identification of "problem" vaccines, potentially endangering the health of the public. " (Emphasis added.)
This means any rational "scientist" would FIRST calibrate by multiplying the VAERS numbers by at least 100 times before trying to go any further. And let's not forget the new CDC directive to all of the hospitals when they rolled out the warp speed death jabs. They ordered the hospitals to report jabbed people (who showed up dying from their injuries) as "unvaccinated" if they'd only received their first jab, and/or it was less than 14 days since their 2nd jab. When your hospital chart says "unvaccinated" your injuries are NOT going to be reported to VAERS.
And on top of all of this, VAERS will not take a report if the injury is not diagnosed within 30 days of the jab anyway. They have never studied ANY vaccine for LONG-TERM health impact. The entire system is specifically engineered to ASSURE over 99% of the injuries and deaths will never be reported. VAERS launders the dead bodies so that that the money made off of them won't need to be laundered.
Yes. The Under Reporting Factor is crucial
https://peterhalligan.substack.com/p/refresher-on-the-under-reporting
https://vaersanalysis.info/2022/10/08/estimating-the-under-reporting-factor-urf-in-vaers-by-way-of-the-recently-released-v-safe-data/
many ways to "kkin that cat"
The VAERS only exists to LIE to us, claiming these things are "rare" when they are COMMON.
I never believed that as many as they say got these injections.
Everyone I know, bar 2 people, have indeed got them.
We have about 10 that did. At least 25 in our circles( counting fam and friends) did not.