With the authors kind permission here is a verbatim reproduction of a rigorously reviewed and painstakingly researched paper on how Pfizer and Moderna were allowed to bypass EU and Australian regulations. Each sentence and paragraph carries too much significance to be abridged or summarized without losing sight of the whole.
Thanks PH. Fearsome amount to wade through. That all of the grammar could be addressed in just one word. Probably too blunt? GENOCIDE. Pre meditated. Pre planned. Now in full force. How in the face of such scientifically proven fact that the injections DO cause irreversible, life changing HARMS. Then the actual DEATHS caused. Any government on earth can still inject their own citizens?
As soon as I heard we were *forced* to take it, it seemed suspicious. Then the prickly words "gene therapy" clinched it ... NO WAY was I consenting. But was I "informed"? That's what I have been exploring since this whole rigmarole started. It gets more complex by the day.
This in-depth explanation gets to the heart of the issue. What's in the vial? It is great ammunition for persuasion purposes. Thank you indeed for going to such lengths to bring it to our plates, as I now mull this one over. I must point out one caveat I am grappling with.
To preface: when confronted with the events of 911, researchers found various teams were vying for top billing on explanations for various facets. These teams had names: "No planers", POD People, controlled-demolitioners, pancake demolitioners, thermite/thermate scientists, LIHOP-ers v MIHOP-ers, the battles about "directed-energy" weapons, cgi-scripts, and digital manipulations went on for years. All agreed the official narrative was a hoax, but there seemed to be layers of hoaxes within hoaxes, and motives and objectives favoring one set of perpetrators versus another. At various points, as one fraudulent infiltrator after another accidentally revealed themselves, teams fell into disarray and the following public was betrayed. It was a war of attrition and exhausted itself by 2006, as the psyops professionals bled dry the inquisitive and outraged.
I fear a similar thing may happen with the "vaccine" ingredients or contents of the vials. It is important not to confuse courts or the law with the science for competing ideas. I know that mRNA gene technology is *said* to be in the injection, but has it been found there? Anyone know for sure?
Mar 26, 2023·edited Mar 26, 2023Liked by Peter Halligan
My thoughts on this. The full virus is soooo tiny that no-one has properly isolated it. Sasha said vials examined by indy scientists did not all contain mRNA just undisclosed metals and some graphine. When autopsies were done after jabs, spike proteins often photographed on brain or liver samples. I agree with your thinking. We are being bombarded with all kinds of fear porn now, funny how they discovered this shocking info by accident and no others did before. Watching video, Jessica reacted a bit like a mad scientist, laughing quite a lot which I didn't care for. Who would actually want to tell a jabbed up person and would they want to know their fate? Many years ago my palm was read. Got a short life line. I asked when they thought I'd croak. He said 62. Well, I parked it away until I was in my 61st year and it weighed on me until I got to 63! I'm 5 years on from then. Would I offer my palm again? Would I ask year of my demise? No. All my family except me have taken them. I feel like I did when I reached 61, except I'm worrying for my kids now. Most people I know have had 2 or 3. I don't think they want any more. Only way to stop this is when live news on mainstream get taken over and BBC or whoever are either forced to read out prepared statement or some medical people do it and explain facts with links to facts.EDIT how can they find spike protein in dead people but not in living?
There has been, as far as I can make out, no comparisons allowed to ensure compliance with the doses administered in the clinical trials and the spike proteins manufactured by the body - in fact, in that video, a claim is made that the spike proteins manufactured by the body are 30% larger than the spike proteins of the virus.
We do know that manufacturing quality control standards for the c19 mRNA injections are way below tolerances for any other "vaccine". The production quality standards have hade to be lowered by 30-40% to allow the deployment of these experimental treatments.
I think that other countries have the same confidentiality issues as the US, but if you check here for a standard contract to an EU country you will see that the contracts signed with Pfizer - not only denies any liability by Pfizer for any harms or quality - it also says that Pfizer can vary the contents of the vials it supplies as "doses", in any way it wants.
I shall have a listen, thank you very much for replying and the link. Again, she appears to simply analyse the documents and what "They" say is in the product. Ana Maria Mihalcea has mentioned that there are 26 teams around the world, analysing the vial contents, all varying tests, microscopes, spectography, etc., confidentiality be damned! They have found graphene oxide, metals, contaminants, hydrogel, all kinds of things, but not an mRNA analysis, whatever that even is. You would need testing equipment difficult to enlist in the venture. (La Quinta Columna was lucky to find a scientist prepared to put his name to his (bar-coded) full analysis and report.) Perhaps the *Princess of Thailand's family is the only 'Authority' we might prevail upon to thumb its nose at the infernal confidentiality agreement!
THIS: Evidently, various mRNAs in humans could be reverse-transcribed and integrated into the genome via L1 retroelements with negative effects on fitness. However, this does not readily imply that this will occur to vaccine mRNAs. A definitive answer will come from experiments and population monitoring .
GMO. Another label which, despite its accuracy, could become quite the legal hurdle when it comes to a jury agreeing to a definition, and proving its use and damage.
I wish godspeed to all those brave souls seeking justice inside the corrupted governments and their arms-length( or not) judiciaries. It’s about all we’ve got between our bodies and tyranny.
I am the male equivalent and I would proudly identify as "an old hag who knits" for a few hours a week for a ringside seat. Your mind seems pretty sharp!
Monumental work ~ thank you. I concede to a fast read and doubtless missed key points at this early juncture. I need to clarify. How/why is a synthetic polynucleotide sequence and its LNPs described as a 'GM Organism'?
'Manufactured conglomerate', 'substance' even, 'pharmaceutical' perhaps, but 'organism'?
In those unfortunate individuals who continue to manufacture S1 subunits (60 days) or who manifest synthetic mRNA injectate (28 days) or the unknown ?1% proportion that reverse transcribe the synthetic sequence, the GM 'Organism' label might indeed be applied?
Thanks PH. Fearsome amount to wade through. That all of the grammar could be addressed in just one word. Probably too blunt? GENOCIDE. Pre meditated. Pre planned. Now in full force. How in the face of such scientifically proven fact that the injections DO cause irreversible, life changing HARMS. Then the actual DEATHS caused. Any government on earth can still inject their own citizens?
The WHO is "The Borg" - it wants complete control of "useless Democracies".
As far as the WHO and the sycophantic unelected bureaucrats from the 194 countries are concerned "Resistance is Futile" and "You will be assimilated".
As soon as I heard we were *forced* to take it, it seemed suspicious. Then the prickly words "gene therapy" clinched it ... NO WAY was I consenting. But was I "informed"? That's what I have been exploring since this whole rigmarole started. It gets more complex by the day.
This in-depth explanation gets to the heart of the issue. What's in the vial? It is great ammunition for persuasion purposes. Thank you indeed for going to such lengths to bring it to our plates, as I now mull this one over. I must point out one caveat I am grappling with.
To preface: when confronted with the events of 911, researchers found various teams were vying for top billing on explanations for various facets. These teams had names: "No planers", POD People, controlled-demolitioners, pancake demolitioners, thermite/thermate scientists, LIHOP-ers v MIHOP-ers, the battles about "directed-energy" weapons, cgi-scripts, and digital manipulations went on for years. All agreed the official narrative was a hoax, but there seemed to be layers of hoaxes within hoaxes, and motives and objectives favoring one set of perpetrators versus another. At various points, as one fraudulent infiltrator after another accidentally revealed themselves, teams fell into disarray and the following public was betrayed. It was a war of attrition and exhausted itself by 2006, as the psyops professionals bled dry the inquisitive and outraged.
I fear a similar thing may happen with the "vaccine" ingredients or contents of the vials. It is important not to confuse courts or the law with the science for competing ideas. I know that mRNA gene technology is *said* to be in the injection, but has it been found there? Anyone know for sure?
My thoughts on this. The full virus is soooo tiny that no-one has properly isolated it. Sasha said vials examined by indy scientists did not all contain mRNA just undisclosed metals and some graphine. When autopsies were done after jabs, spike proteins often photographed on brain or liver samples. I agree with your thinking. We are being bombarded with all kinds of fear porn now, funny how they discovered this shocking info by accident and no others did before. Watching video, Jessica reacted a bit like a mad scientist, laughing quite a lot which I didn't care for. Who would actually want to tell a jabbed up person and would they want to know their fate? Many years ago my palm was read. Got a short life line. I asked when they thought I'd croak. He said 62. Well, I parked it away until I was in my 61st year and it weighed on me until I got to 63! I'm 5 years on from then. Would I offer my palm again? Would I ask year of my demise? No. All my family except me have taken them. I feel like I did when I reached 61, except I'm worrying for my kids now. Most people I know have had 2 or 3. I don't think they want any more. Only way to stop this is when live news on mainstream get taken over and BBC or whoever are either forced to read out prepared statement or some medical people do it and explain facts with links to facts.EDIT how can they find spike protein in dead people but not in living?
Good question.
As I understand it, it is illegal to test the contents of the vials used for injections.
The closest I have seen to an analysis of the contents is this:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/1MG7hHpprd9P/
There has been, as far as I can make out, no comparisons allowed to ensure compliance with the doses administered in the clinical trials and the spike proteins manufactured by the body - in fact, in that video, a claim is made that the spike proteins manufactured by the body are 30% larger than the spike proteins of the virus.
We do know that manufacturing quality control standards for the c19 mRNA injections are way below tolerances for any other "vaccine". The production quality standards have hade to be lowered by 30-40% to allow the deployment of these experimental treatments.
I think that other countries have the same confidentiality issues as the US, but if you check here for a standard contract to an EU country you will see that the contracts signed with Pfizer - not only denies any liability by Pfizer for any harms or quality - it also says that Pfizer can vary the contents of the vials it supplies as "doses", in any way it wants.
https://peterhalligan.substack.com/p/25-page-pfizer-contract-to-eu-member
I shall have a listen, thank you very much for replying and the link. Again, she appears to simply analyse the documents and what "They" say is in the product. Ana Maria Mihalcea has mentioned that there are 26 teams around the world, analysing the vial contents, all varying tests, microscopes, spectography, etc., confidentiality be damned! They have found graphene oxide, metals, contaminants, hydrogel, all kinds of things, but not an mRNA analysis, whatever that even is. You would need testing equipment difficult to enlist in the venture. (La Quinta Columna was lucky to find a scientist prepared to put his name to his (bar-coded) full analysis and report.) Perhaps the *Princess of Thailand's family is the only 'Authority' we might prevail upon to thumb its nose at the infernal confidentiality agreement!
*did you hear this story?
THIS: Evidently, various mRNAs in humans could be reverse-transcribed and integrated into the genome via L1 retroelements with negative effects on fitness. However, this does not readily imply that this will occur to vaccine mRNAs. A definitive answer will come from experiments and population monitoring .
THIS IS UNFORGIVABLE..
GMO. Another label which, despite its accuracy, could become quite the legal hurdle when it comes to a jury agreeing to a definition, and proving its use and damage.
I wish godspeed to all those brave souls seeking justice inside the corrupted governments and their arms-length( or not) judiciaries. It’s about all we’ve got between our bodies and tyranny.
As I am an Old Hag, I was thinking more of guillotines and knitting ...
I am the male equivalent and I would proudly identify as "an old hag who knits" for a few hours a week for a ringside seat. Your mind seems pretty sharp!
"It’s about all we’ve got between our bodies and tyranny."
I don't know....pitch-forks etc.. spring to mind.
Monumental work ~ thank you. I concede to a fast read and doubtless missed key points at this early juncture. I need to clarify. How/why is a synthetic polynucleotide sequence and its LNPs described as a 'GM Organism'?
'Manufactured conglomerate', 'substance' even, 'pharmaceutical' perhaps, but 'organism'?
In those unfortunate individuals who continue to manufacture S1 subunits (60 days) or who manifest synthetic mRNA injectate (28 days) or the unknown ?1% proportion that reverse transcribe the synthetic sequence, the GM 'Organism' label might indeed be applied?
My impression is that the emphasis is a legal one as well as scientifi.medical.