Let me say at the outset that it is an abomination to experiment on pregnant women and under babies, tots and children of any age – the C19 modified mRNA injections FAILED their clinical trials – approval was given using “immune-bridging” but not for babies under 6 months old.
In-utero exposure to the jabs is WAY MORE dangerous than after birth.
But who cares WHEN they want to jab us with pure poison that has ZERO possible benefits?
I have yet to see evidence of ANY "genetic" (or other) profile, whether based upon age, sex, race, income, etc., which is inherently impervious to harm from toxic injections. If it hurts ANYONE, it hurts EVERYONE exposed to it, although some might have worse outcomes than others, based upon their constitution.
Never mind the CDC .. what of the legion of "doctors" and "nurses" complicit with a process that defies rationality, whose education and professional training artfully dodges proper critical thinking and due scientific analysis of "vaccines" while simultaneously weaving their way around the real crusher, the (absence of) measures of effectiveness and freedom from enduring healthspan attenuating, BigPharma poisoning? /rhet
They must have a hell of an understanding of the human growth process. Not acceptable at 5months for anyone and good for all at 6 months. Where are the studies?
Cannot find the link on X, someone posted about 3 or 4 days ago "How did the Japanese get rid of SIDS? By not vaxxing any child younger than 2 years old." Do not have any verification of this; but makes sense, as the baby's immune system is not fully developed until that time. You will not find any basis for the CDC's decisions of when to do what, appears they arbitrarily picked dates. Del BigTree has been talking about this topic for a long time.
Following the US Childhood Immunization Schedule makes it easier to add another shot to the multitude prepared for planned "Well Baby Checks." Knowing they inject newborns (often in the delivery room) the first of several shots given before 18 months, shows they don't care about immunology 101, health or age of the child. They only desire profits and care not the risks. SIDS comes to mind. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/easy-to-read/child-easyread.html
In-utero exposure to the jabs is WAY MORE dangerous than after birth.
But who cares WHEN they want to jab us with pure poison that has ZERO possible benefits?
I have yet to see evidence of ANY "genetic" (or other) profile, whether based upon age, sex, race, income, etc., which is inherently impervious to harm from toxic injections. If it hurts ANYONE, it hurts EVERYONE exposed to it, although some might have worse outcomes than others, based upon their constitution.
Never mind the CDC .. what of the legion of "doctors" and "nurses" complicit with a process that defies rationality, whose education and professional training artfully dodges proper critical thinking and due scientific analysis of "vaccines" while simultaneously weaving their way around the real crusher, the (absence of) measures of effectiveness and freedom from enduring healthspan attenuating, BigPharma poisoning? /rhet
They must have a hell of an understanding of the human growth process. Not acceptable at 5months for anyone and good for all at 6 months. Where are the studies?
Cannot find the link on X, someone posted about 3 or 4 days ago "How did the Japanese get rid of SIDS? By not vaxxing any child younger than 2 years old." Do not have any verification of this; but makes sense, as the baby's immune system is not fully developed until that time. You will not find any basis for the CDC's decisions of when to do what, appears they arbitrarily picked dates. Del BigTree has been talking about this topic for a long time.
Following the US Childhood Immunization Schedule makes it easier to add another shot to the multitude prepared for planned "Well Baby Checks." Knowing they inject newborns (often in the delivery room) the first of several shots given before 18 months, shows they don't care about immunology 101, health or age of the child. They only desire profits and care not the risks. SIDS comes to mind. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/easy-to-read/child-easyread.html
They did do studies. They just hid them. This is a great peer reviewed paper by Dr Steven Hatfill about all the corruption.
https://img1.wsimg.com/blobby/go/7d181a8e-ee37-425a-a2b6-8674d27bacea/AAPS%20DSH%20Paper.pdf
Dr. Mengele would be proud...
Ingredients in childhood vaccines
https://www.chop.edu/centers-programs/vaccine-education-center/vaccine-ingredients
Its not vaccines they are all transfections with a witches brew of aluminum and other toxins.
Why do this to an infant who is totally proteced by its mother?