Return to the scene of the crime - the Phase 3 Pfizer clinical trials of late 2020
Returning to the scene of the crime – Pfizer Phase 3 Clinical Trials
Assertion 1: Pfizer failed to withdraw its mRNA gene therapy from consideration when it knew it had failed the sole pre-specified end point of “The prevention of symptomatic disease in the vaccine recipient”. Its clinical trial results demonstrated (large) increases in all-cause adverse events that evidence symptomatic C19 disease.
Assertion 2: The FDA/CDC (and health regulators in every other country that approved and rolled-out mRNA vaccines) failed to validate this sole end-point of the clinical trials and were/are criminally negligent.
Evidence: The pre-specified sole end point of the clinical trials was the prevention of symptomatic disease in the vaccine recipient. Pfizer did not provideand highlight clinical trial evidence and analysis that this prevention occurred or did not occur, in the context of all-cause adverse events that occurred from the aggregate of C19 disease and/or the injections.
Clinical trial evidence of the prevention of symptomatic disease
The Canadian Critical Care Alliance (CCCA) compiled an analysis that indirectly showed the presence of the C19 disease AND NOT the SARS-COV2 virus. I contend that the onset of the disease is the cause of the adverse events and not the infection by the virus.
Interruption of the transmission of the SARS-COV2 virus was not an end point of the clinical trials. Neither was prevention of ER visits, hospitalization or death resulting from the C19 disease. These end points were articulated and specifically excluded BEFORE the clinical trials commenced. Any claims or assertions by any politician, health authority, MSM or social media outlet that this is not the case, is false.
Analysis by the CCCA showed the data for the sole end-point (the prevention of symptomatic disease in the vaccine recipient) in the form of all-cause adverse events. In aggregate, these were four times higher in the injected group (24% incidence) compared to the placebo group (6% incidence). This indicates there is no evidence of C19 disease prevention. Indeed, any reduction in C19 disease results in a greater amount of harm from injections, relative to the placebo.
The other category of adverse events indicating presence of C19 disease (but not an ER visit, hospitalization or death) is “serious adverse events that interfered significantly with daily activities”. These were 75% higher in the injected group (1.2% in the injected group v 0.7% in the placebo).
Several key results from the Pfizer clinical trial that were NOT specified as clinical trial endpoints are below:
1. a claimed 91% reduction in infections (0.4% in the injected group v 3.8% in the placebo) that was entirely coincidental to the clinical trial process (see note 8 for claims of fraud and incompetence in just one of the Pfizer clinical trial sites
2. an almost 50% increase In all-cause mortality (20/21,900 in the injected group v 14/21,900 in the placebo group)
3. serious adverse events that required ER or hospitalization (life threatening) were 10% higher in the injected group (1.2% in the injected group v 0.7% in the placebo group).
To repeat, the sole endpoint of the clinical trial was the prevention of symptomatic disease in the vaccine recipient. The results of the clinical trial showed that the sum of injection harms and symptomatic disease in the injected group vastly exceeded the incidence of disease in the placebo.
This information was available to both Pfizer and the FDA/CDC. Declaring the clinical trials a success and proceeding with the injection roll-out was an act of fraud by Pfizer and acts of wilful malfeasance and/or negligence by the FDA/CDC. Similarly all health authorities that permitted the roll-out of injections around the world (who had these clinical trial results and the pre-specified end-point) are similarly guilty of malfeasance and/or criminal negligence. Incompetence of health authorities, like ignorance, is no defence. This is the are of their supposed competence.
By way of background, just in case you are wondering where all this comes from, here are ten background thoughts. You can open link at point 7 to get to the clinical end-points and the 51 page CCCA analysis at point 9 for the basis of the above.
1. Outbreaks of “California Flu” in Eastern Ukraine – was this a less efficient version of SARS-COV2 developed by the US Military plus MetaBiota and EcoHealth Alliance targeting East Ukrainian rebels using the dozens of biolabs that the US had paid to install and manage inside Ukraine?
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/P-8-2016-000636_EN.html?redirect
2. Detection of the SARS-COV2 in Italy in the summer of 2019 – was this the result of migrating Chinese workers to northern Italy – was it present even earlier and diagnosed as chronic pneumonia for months? Was this also the case in neighbouring countries?
Coronavirus Was in Italy Before The Pandemic - YouTube
3. Event 201 held on 18 October 2019 in New York City.
Event 201, a pandemic exercise to illustrate preparedness efforts (centerforhealthsecurity.org)
“The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in partnership with the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation hosted Event 201, a high-level pandemic exercise on October 18, 2019, in New York, NY. The exercise illustrated areas where public/private partnerships will be necessary during the response to a severe pandemic in order to diminish large-scale economic and societal consequences.”
4. The 2019 Military World Games were held from 18 October 2019 to 27 October 2019 in Wuhan, the capital of Hubei Province, China. The US came in 35th winning silver medals for the men’s basketball, women’s team golf and women’s 50kg wrestling.
5. 100-200 Congress Critters plus family members and staff taking Ivermectin over a 15 month period reported in October 2021
6. The shutting down of virtually free Ivermectin and HCQ protocols as soon as clinical trials commenced
7. The end points of the mRNA clinical trials
Pfizer fraudulently misrepresented the end points in its clinical trial (substack.com)
8. The conduct of the clinical trials under the conditions of Operation Warp Speed – whistle blower testimony of Ventavia malpractice – Pfizer’s argument for the defence is “the Government told me to do it”.
https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/shows/good-morning-chd/TEFlQ70WM3
and
Covid-19: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer’s vaccine trial | The BMJ
https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n2635
9. Canadian Critical Care Alliance analysis of the Pfizer Phase 3 clinical trial
The COVID-19 Inoculations - More Harm Than Good FINAL Video & Print - MoreHarm.pdf | DocDroid
htps://www.docdroid.net/qQyBoKQ/the-covid-19-inoculations-more-harm-than-good-final-video-print-moreharm-pdf
10. The recent “revelation” that Pfizer did not test whether the injections prevented transmission. We’ve all seen the “revelatory confession” of the Pfizer marketing executive testifying to the EU Parliamentary Enquiry.
A competent analysis, presented in a court of law, would demonstrate beyond any doubt that Pfizer committed fraud in its clinical trials. This should invalidate their immunity from vaccine damages under the emergency use authorisation, but the bizarre defence is that the fraud was authorised by the government, therefore the Pharma companies are not culpable!
https://twitter.com/RepThomasMassie/status/1587055742967861255
Pfizer’s original vaccine trial which contained 1200 participants with evidence of prior infection, showed no benefit from their shots for those who had evidence of prior infection.
@CDCgov
lied, said study showed it was 92% efficacious for those w/ evidence of prior infection.