Pfizer’s original vaccine trial which contained 1200 participants with evidence of prior infection, showed no benefit from their shots for those who had evidence of prior infection.
@CDCgov
lied, said study showed it was 92% efficacious for those w/ evidence of prior infection.
A competent analysis, presented in a court of law, would demonstrate beyond any doubt that Pfizer committed fraud in its clinical trials. This should invalidate their immunity from vaccine damages under the emergency use authorisation, but the bizarre defence is that the fraud was authorised by the government, therefore the Pharma companies are not culpable!
https://twitter.com/RepThomasMassie/status/1587055742967861255
Pfizer’s original vaccine trial which contained 1200 participants with evidence of prior infection, showed no benefit from their shots for those who had evidence of prior infection.
@CDCgov
lied, said study showed it was 92% efficacious for those w/ evidence of prior infection.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/BDz8rPPlRo1N/
ONS sample group discussion
A competent analysis, presented in a court of law, would demonstrate beyond any doubt that Pfizer committed fraud in its clinical trials. This should invalidate their immunity from vaccine damages under the emergency use authorisation, but the bizarre defence is that the fraud was authorised by the government, therefore the Pharma companies are not culpable!