Are you able to point me to any studies that show vaccinated kids having significantly reduced IGG months after their first two injections? IGM and IGA in line. Experiencing constant sicknesses. I do not see IgG3 and IgG4 separated on the blood tests. Do those need to be tested separately?
Important question, though I suspect (which has zero basis in fact, knowledge, expertise or experience!) the answer is "IgG distribution is recovered after three-four months or so - reflecting the length of time which injection efficacy reverts to zero - or kills the patient"
Bon chance and please let us know if you find out the answer.
I started these infusions two years ago after a bout with cancer. At that time we were given a "composition" analysis. As the vaccines were introduced, we got less information. I have always been concerned that the vaccines (or their after-effects) would appear in the IVIG formulations. The company, GRIFOLS, did not answers inquiries, but added "batch information" and requested these references be noted on their infusion orders. I was told this was to track reactions. Currently, I am speaking to my doctors about discontinuing infusions until full disclosure is made as to composition. In 2021 doctors believed the product contained "natural antibodies" and this was confirmed with testing. By 2022 many of us feared "vaccine remnants" or other effects of the vaccines would be in the IVIG. We can't get answers.
Disappointing. I hope things improve for you and everyone else. Are there any signs of the government launching an enquiry into the whole shebang - as the governments of the UK, Germany and Japan are showing signs of doing?
There are no signs of concern or government investigations. Many people getting IVIG sought to avoid the untested Covid Vaccine but we/they are now receiving it through the plasma of others. I am likely going to stop these treatments. The blood supply (transfusions) and all plasma derived products are now compromised by the vaccine. 5 million people in the US get blood transfusions in a year and more use plasma by-products. It is a risk nobody is talking about.
I am on a monthly IVIG infusion and cannot get any answers from doctors or the company that produces the product. That information, like so much more, is being supressed. Many thousands may be at risk.
Interesting. I guess asking for an assay or similar that would reveal IGg distribution in plasma would not be entertained - even if it is just to view the normal quality control checks done by the blood bank from which you get yours? - as a sort of "tour"
All of this says (in my mind): Anyone with 2 injections and breakthrough infections has a compromised immune system. Anyone with 3 or more injections has a compromised immune system. All of which means that nearly everyone who has been injected will be among the sick, dying or dead in the next couple years.
I watched an interview with Dr. Shankara Chetty, a STH African doctor who has kept every one of many thousands of patients out of hospital whilst treating them for covid . His modus operandi was to treat purely on symtomology. He found that if a patient seemed to be coping ok , but then began to experience breathlessness and take a turn for the worse (usually around Day 8) , he would prescribe antihistamines. He concluded that what was occurring was an actual allergic reaction ( to the spike protein)....not one patient needed hospitalisation. This massive rise in IgG4 seems to explain / verify his observations. What do you think ?
I have no medical training. Rather my background is assessing the probability of outcomes based on infrastructure, people, process, risk management, compliance, performance and costs. From an investment management perspective
In my view, "if it ain't broke don't fix it" works and so do repeatable outcomes within known risk parameters!
Are you able to point me to any studies that show vaccinated kids having significantly reduced IGG months after their first two injections? IGM and IGA in line. Experiencing constant sicknesses. I do not see IgG3 and IgG4 separated on the blood tests. Do those need to be tested separately?
Good question. The article did not address IgG responses to BNT162b2 in children - rather the spread of SRV from parents to children.
There are papers that show some of the effects of IgG4 generally.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31291621/
The methods section here has FACS-based antibody assay
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciimmunol.ade2798
Serological assays recommended for antibody detection rather than molecular assays recommended https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34375345/
You might get a helpful response from the author of the Rintrah article that I referenced throughout - or perhaps from Geert vanden Bossche via his website https://substack.com/profile/57302394-geert-vanden-bossche
Important question, though I suspect (which has zero basis in fact, knowledge, expertise or experience!) the answer is "IgG distribution is recovered after three-four months or so - reflecting the length of time which injection efficacy reverts to zero - or kills the patient"
Bon chance and please let us know if you find out the answer.
I started these infusions two years ago after a bout with cancer. At that time we were given a "composition" analysis. As the vaccines were introduced, we got less information. I have always been concerned that the vaccines (or their after-effects) would appear in the IVIG formulations. The company, GRIFOLS, did not answers inquiries, but added "batch information" and requested these references be noted on their infusion orders. I was told this was to track reactions. Currently, I am speaking to my doctors about discontinuing infusions until full disclosure is made as to composition. In 2021 doctors believed the product contained "natural antibodies" and this was confirmed with testing. By 2022 many of us feared "vaccine remnants" or other effects of the vaccines would be in the IVIG. We can't get answers.
Disappointing. I hope things improve for you and everyone else. Are there any signs of the government launching an enquiry into the whole shebang - as the governments of the UK, Germany and Japan are showing signs of doing?
There are no signs of concern or government investigations. Many people getting IVIG sought to avoid the untested Covid Vaccine but we/they are now receiving it through the plasma of others. I am likely going to stop these treatments. The blood supply (transfusions) and all plasma derived products are now compromised by the vaccine. 5 million people in the US get blood transfusions in a year and more use plasma by-products. It is a risk nobody is talking about.
Be careful though. Dr McCullough advised that baby Will accept the blood from the bank. Maybe seek prophylaxis before receipt. Maybe some clues here https://covid19criticalcare.com/treatment-protocols/i-prevent-protect/
How does this effect the supply of IVIG that tens of thousands rely on to survive? It's prepared from donor plasma.
Yes. And those donors are likely to be the same as the proportion injected (>80%?)
Checking the UK's NHS here: March 2022
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/blood-tissue-and-organ-donors-surveillance-schemes
and from 2009
"monitors infection in blood, tissue and organ donors, and transfusion recipients."
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK142998/
"Screening Donated Blood for Transfusion-Transmissible Infections: Recommendations"
there is no specific mention of IGg's in general or their percentage distribution specifically.
It seems to me that if IGg4 dominates, there is an issue with blood plasma in general. IGg3 is the "natural immunity" IGg that kills the spike?
I am on a monthly IVIG infusion and cannot get any answers from doctors or the company that produces the product. That information, like so much more, is being supressed. Many thousands may be at risk.
Interesting. I guess asking for an assay or similar that would reveal IGg distribution in plasma would not be entertained - even if it is just to view the normal quality control checks done by the blood bank from which you get yours? - as a sort of "tour"
All of this says (in my mind): Anyone with 2 injections and breakthrough infections has a compromised immune system. Anyone with 3 or more injections has a compromised immune system. All of which means that nearly everyone who has been injected will be among the sick, dying or dead in the next couple years.
Geez. That's like dealing with a crime wave by turning off everybody's burglar alarms.
I watched an interview with Dr. Shankara Chetty, a STH African doctor who has kept every one of many thousands of patients out of hospital whilst treating them for covid . His modus operandi was to treat purely on symtomology. He found that if a patient seemed to be coping ok , but then began to experience breathlessness and take a turn for the worse (usually around Day 8) , he would prescribe antihistamines. He concluded that what was occurring was an actual allergic reaction ( to the spike protein)....not one patient needed hospitalisation. This massive rise in IgG4 seems to explain / verify his observations. What do you think ?
I have no medical training. Rather my background is assessing the probability of outcomes based on infrastructure, people, process, risk management, compliance, performance and costs. From an investment management perspective
In my view, "if it ain't broke don't fix it" works and so do repeatable outcomes within known risk parameters!
So both tenets seem to apply!