The article linked below highlights the chasm between reality of the atrocities of the vaxx and the conjecture of those holding to a defunct and defeated narrative:
Peter!! A diagnostic tool was developed in Germany at least a year ago, and was initially used by Prof Arne Burkardt (and now by other pathologists) to determine the spike damage alone, from the shots; or whether the spikes are attached to protein, signs of illness. Prof Burkhardt passed on last year, but his presentation slides are often shown as examples.
I think Kevin McKernan also said that it was simple enough to distinguish between spike from the virus v spike from the injection.
I am baffled as to why this is not been developed into the narrative pf "la resistance".
Probably too hard to get autopsies done on say 10,000 infection spikes and 10,000 vaxx spikes and then work out a way to verify the scale of deaths by infection or injection
Sorry to bore you by repeating this once again but there's no direct proof spike is being produced, only antibodies assumed to be specific to it. Prof. Burkhardt refers to "expression" of spike protein and antibodies "seeming to have a high specificity to the spike protein". On using an antibody assay or immuno-staining or whatever they're proposing to determine whether death is caused by virus or vax: given the numerous ways these injections can kill you, massive amounts of deaths would be missed. Mechanisms of death associated with these injections are multiple. In short, imo, not a good idea.
Interesting. Definitely a need to somehow calibrate the rate of harms for each of the components of the injection (lipids, PEG, nanoparticles, endotoxins, frame shifts, SV40 fragment etc) - including aspiration or not, time from removal from deep freeze and injection, by dose whether from the top or bottom of the vial after 1, 2, 5 or ten "shakes" or inversions.
I would not be at all surprised to find that the intention was always to cull the weak via an instruction in the mod mRNA to create fibrous clots in people with unhealthy characteristics i a sort of eugenics plot to leave only those with particular genes.
At the back of my mind is the question "how does anyone know what the instructions were in the mod MRNA injections?.
That would be very difficult. Maybe it would be easier to look for common ingredient in all the injections, mRNA or not, given they're all more or less equally toxic. So start by ruling out the mod/mRNA. I don't think it's been isolated from blood of any patient, dead or alive, and only small amounts are said to have been found in vials. So maybe either there's none at all or it remains trapped in LNPs. I'm tending towards none at all, so no instructions. On the "clots", I'm thinking they may not have been intended. Of course they're not bothered about killing people, esp. the weak/handicapped/elderly, but if principal aim is to track/trace electronically the common ingredient must have properties that facilitate that. Also, small point: after October 2021, freezing Pfizer vials was no longer necessary, according to Prof/Dr Gabriel Segala as they apparently changed the "PBS" buffer.
You may want to find the older presentations of the initial Burkhardt slides. Tissue by tissue location, damage is clearly seen, especially dramatic when compared with healthy tissue. Before he died, Prof Burkhardt had autopsied about 75 people, focusing on damaged lung, heart and brain tissue. Here's a link to his last interview, its 2 hrs long: https://youtu.be/3rvNWkyy0Wc?si=LxOt6cROdQ6HZcGk - this discussion did not get nearly enough views.
Without autopsies? Yes, coroners are often labeling as deaths from covid, not from the shots. See John Beaudoin's VSRF discussion for more on where they are hiding the deaths: "VSRF Live #105: Vaccine Death Data & CDC Cover Up" - https://rumble.com/v400f7j-vsrf-live-105-cdc-cover-up.html
International crisis summit day1 https://www.youtube.com/live/rwn27RSXdvQ?si=rE8QCdKGuzzDN-R-
Watching...
short speeches!
https://twitter.com/kevin_mckernan/status/1761146637441782247
Rumble links part1 https://rumble.com/v491s56-david-martin-great-set-up.html part2 https://rumble.com/v4f2v3c-the-great-setup-with-dr.-david-martin-part-2.html
https://rumble.com/v4ewnf8-dark-to-light-replay-v-safe-covid-shot-database-live-look.html
Peter!! A diagnostic tool was developed in Germany at least a year ago, and was initially used by Prof Arne Burkardt (and now by other pathologists) to determine the spike damage alone, from the shots; or whether the spikes are attached to protein, signs of illness. Prof Burkhardt passed on last year, but his presentation slides are often shown as examples.
I think Kevin McKernan also said that it was simple enough to distinguish between spike from the virus v spike from the injection.
I am baffled as to why this is not been developed into the narrative pf "la resistance".
Probably too hard to get autopsies done on say 10,000 infection spikes and 10,000 vaxx spikes and then work out a way to verify the scale of deaths by infection or injection
Sorry to bore you by repeating this once again but there's no direct proof spike is being produced, only antibodies assumed to be specific to it. Prof. Burkhardt refers to "expression" of spike protein and antibodies "seeming to have a high specificity to the spike protein". On using an antibody assay or immuno-staining or whatever they're proposing to determine whether death is caused by virus or vax: given the numerous ways these injections can kill you, massive amounts of deaths would be missed. Mechanisms of death associated with these injections are multiple. In short, imo, not a good idea.
Interesting. Definitely a need to somehow calibrate the rate of harms for each of the components of the injection (lipids, PEG, nanoparticles, endotoxins, frame shifts, SV40 fragment etc) - including aspiration or not, time from removal from deep freeze and injection, by dose whether from the top or bottom of the vial after 1, 2, 5 or ten "shakes" or inversions.
I would not be at all surprised to find that the intention was always to cull the weak via an instruction in the mod mRNA to create fibrous clots in people with unhealthy characteristics i a sort of eugenics plot to leave only those with particular genes.
At the back of my mind is the question "how does anyone know what the instructions were in the mod MRNA injections?.
That would be very difficult. Maybe it would be easier to look for common ingredient in all the injections, mRNA or not, given they're all more or less equally toxic. So start by ruling out the mod/mRNA. I don't think it's been isolated from blood of any patient, dead or alive, and only small amounts are said to have been found in vials. So maybe either there's none at all or it remains trapped in LNPs. I'm tending towards none at all, so no instructions. On the "clots", I'm thinking they may not have been intended. Of course they're not bothered about killing people, esp. the weak/handicapped/elderly, but if principal aim is to track/trace electronically the common ingredient must have properties that facilitate that. Also, small point: after October 2021, freezing Pfizer vials was no longer necessary, according to Prof/Dr Gabriel Segala as they apparently changed the "PBS" buffer.
You may want to find the older presentations of the initial Burkhardt slides. Tissue by tissue location, damage is clearly seen, especially dramatic when compared with healthy tissue. Before he died, Prof Burkhardt had autopsied about 75 people, focusing on damaged lung, heart and brain tissue. Here's a link to his last interview, its 2 hrs long: https://youtu.be/3rvNWkyy0Wc?si=LxOt6cROdQ6HZcGk - this discussion did not get nearly enough views.
Without autopsies? Yes, coroners are often labeling as deaths from covid, not from the shots. See John Beaudoin's VSRF discussion for more on where they are hiding the deaths: "VSRF Live #105: Vaccine Death Data & CDC Cover Up" - https://rumble.com/v400f7j-vsrf-live-105-cdc-cover-up.html
Thanks Sherman. I've watched them all.
Here's an interesting tweet
https://twitter.com/kevin_mckernan/status/1761146637441782247