The corrupt and incompetent FDA states “no safety concerns related to the sequence of, or amount of, residual DNA have been identified.”

Simply classified as "unknown outcome" or "lost to follow-ip".

Keep in mind that Phase 3 clinical trials were fraudulently conducted using “Process 1” and revealed more harm than good AND that Process 2 used to manufacture the injections  actually shot into arms were indicated to be at least twice as harmful AND that the 10 week post marketing authorization report to 28 February 2021 showed 1,223 deaths amongst 42,000 adverse events reported – with 9,000 unknown outcomes of the 42,000 adverse events – this statement beggars belief.

From here:

FDA Responds After Being Urged to Recall Pfizer's Vaccine Over DNA Fragments | The Epoch Times

The FDA spokesperson made this statement in reply to questions from the Epoch Times.

"With over a billion doses of the mRNA vaccines administered, no safety concerns related to the sequence of, or amount of, residual DNA have been identified. With regard to the FDA-approved mRNA vaccines, available scientific evidence supports the conclusion that they are safe and effective," the spokeswoman added.”

Actually, 677 million C19 mRNA doses were administered in the US amongst around 7 billion worldwide.

Further, the FDA refused to expedite a follow up question.

“The Epoch Times has submitted a Freedom of Information Act query to try to unlock when the FDA learned about the sequence, and from whom. The FDA denied expedited processing for the request, claiming there is not a "compelling need" to quickly provide the information.”

Let’s refresh out memories of the adverse events reported to the VAERS system. Note that the FDA/CDC has switched from weekly reporting to monthly reporting of the adverse events it receives – prior adverse events were “curated” by General Dynamics IT, who were paid tens of millions of dollars to do this “curating”.

From here:

VAERS Summary for COVID-19 Vaccines through 9/29/2023 – VAERS Analysis

Keep in mind that an adverse event is updated only once. Someone dying following hospitalization remains categorized in the “hospitalizations” category, even if they die. Keep in mind also that there could be a back log of millions of reports that the FDA/CDC/General Dynamics IT personnel have not processed.

Now, consider also that the adverse events reported to VAERS ARE UNDER-REPORTED by a large factor. Here are some estimates of the Under Reporting Factor that centres around 30-40 compared to an historical number in excess of 100 (one event reported to VAERS for every 100 adverse events).

(100) Refresher on the Under Reporting Factor (URF) – The Giant Syringe in the Room (substack.com)

Here’s a table of deaths and injuries over the first ten weeks of the roll-out of Pfizer/BioNTech’s injections.

reissue_5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf (phmpt.org)

It is important to highlight the relative lethality of the injections by referencing the number shipped in the report  to the FDA from Pfizer. Pfizer says this:

“It is estimated that approximately 126,212,580 doses of BNT162b2 were shipped worldwide from the receipt of the first temporary authorisation for emergency supply on 01 December 2020 through 28 February 2021.”

126 million shipped – which Pfizer put in its report to the FDA – 1,223 deaths = one death per 103,000 doses.

From here and here, the number of doses administered – given that the US and EU received their doses FIRST is as below – EU first, then the US.

Total of 66.4 million (compared to the 126.2 million shipped) - 1,223 deaths = one death per 56,000 doses.

What is the Under Reporting Factor during this period of just ten weeks? I suspect it is far higher than current estimates of around 30-40. Most medics in the EU and US probably had far more important things to worry about during those ten weeks of early 2021 – even if they knew that adverse event reporting systems like EUDRA and VAERS even existed.

Keep In mind that recent estimates indicate that it takes just 800 doses to kill someone with a C19 injection.

(100) Using Southern Hemisphere data, New report from Denis Rancourt et al. estimates 17 million died following C19 injections – ONE DEATH PER 800 DOSES and that injecting the elderly was NOT a good idea (substack.com)

One death every 800 doses over a long term of a few years v one death per 56,000 doses over a ten week period in early 2021. Does that indicate an under-reporting factor of around 70? (56,000/800) maybe not, but let’s look at the reports from the V-Safe survey of 10 million or so to get a little more context.

Note that the CDC/FDA terminated the V-Safe reporting in May 2023 and that anyone that died during the survey period was NOT reported.

From here:

Estimating the Under-Reporting Factor (URF) in VAERS by Way of the Recently Released V-Safe Data – VAERS Analysis

These are just 3 of the categories from the link. Recent narratives suggest that pain at the injection site is a leading indicator of problems later on.

The V-Safe system itself has an under-reporting factor which might even increase with severity – note that a dead person does not report. There is also no clue whether multiple injuries – worsening conditions for example – are reported or only one report per person is allowed. Neither is there any indication of the manufacturer or number of doses. (This may be here, but the system is too clever for me!)

V-Safe Data - ICAN - Informed Consent Action Network (icandecide.org)

Now compare those indications of harms to the FDA statement “..no safety concerns related to the sequence of, or amount of, residual DNA have been identified.”

There are literally millions of safety concerns that either relate directly to the C19 mRNA injections or to the contaminants. The FDA is acting exactly how a criminal would act when interrogated about a crime. But it is worse. The case has been demonstrated and it is saying “so what, see if I care”.

A few more comments.

It is not just the numbers of adverse events and their frequency that indicate harms.

Consider the chart below from here: COVID Vaccine Data - OpenVAERS

More than 4,200 died on the same day as they were injected. More than 3,000 the next day and 1,500 within 48 hours. How is this NOT a safety signal. We can pray that the under reporting factor is close to 1). Imagine if those shot dead in the street were treated with the same disdain.

Perhaps drawing the analogy of 4,200 George Floyd’s is in bad taste, but it bears scrutiny.

Lastly, consider this:

(100) Study of Pfizer Phase 2/3 Clinical Trial of mRNA injections by Daily Clout published in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice and Research (substack.com)

Referencing this report:

(PDF) Forensic analysis of the 38 subject deaths in the 6-Month Interim Report of the Pfizer/BioNTech BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccine Clinical Trial (researchgate.net)

Note that the number of expected deaths for the 44,000 or so trail participants over the period of the clinical trial is 222 v the dozens who actually died. Now from that report.

“7. The number of subject deaths was 17% of the expected number, based on age-adjusted US mortality. One possible explanation could lie in the 395 subjects that were “Lost to Follow[1]up”.

Got that? 395 subjects lost to follow-up. Maybe they did not respond to letters and phone calls because most of them were dead? If so, how many were injected and how many were in the placebo? What if 2/3 of that number were in the injected group and 1/3 in the placebo? Maybe it is an issue. 222 expected background deaths  amongst 44,000 in the trial, but only 38 deaths in the trial, leaves 184 deaths that should have happened out of 395 not followed up. The split between vaxxed and unvaxxed is vital for those lost to follow up.

Onwards!

Please subscribe or make a donation via ko-fi. “God Bless You” if you can’t or don’t want to.

Ko-fi donations here: https://ko-fi.com/peterhalligan - an annual subscription of 100 bucks is one third less than a $3 ko-fi donation a week!