41 Comments

Pfuck Pfizer!

Expand full comment

PFIZER SMOKING GUN STATEMENT IN COURT: “We did not defraud the government; we delivered the fraud the government ordered.” Pfizer motion to dismiss in Brook Jackson False Claims Act lawsuit. This surprisingly eloquent lawyer's weasel admission says it all.

Expand full comment

Prior to SARS-CoV-2, the medical & legal requirements for an agent to be approved as a vaccine included ability to prevent: 1. INFECTION, 2. REPLICATION, 3. TRANSMISSION. These requirements were waived as the AI nanoweapon aka "vaccine" does none of these.

Expand full comment

For all the receipts on the DoD contracts behind the depopulation agent, look up KAREN KINGSTON. Her documents show the "vaccine" is an AI nanoweapon in the form of a biosynthetic parasite. Isn't it so interesting that the most effective treatment for respiratory infections of any variant are cheap, generic antiparasitics ivermectin & hydroxychloroquine. Just sayin'

Expand full comment
author

Yes. I have been reading Karen's work for some months - including the spat with Sasha Latypova over "prosecutability" of big pharma v protection of big pharma as it is "following orders" from DoD/BARDA.

Expand full comment
Feb 22, 2023·edited Feb 22, 2023Liked by Peter Halligan

Pay attention, not only to what is said, but also to what is omitted.

It's very interesting to see the reports of how many unused doses have already been disposed of globally, I believe it's easily several hundred million, possibly approaching a billion. This article is the first mention I've seen that highly specialized incinerators are needed (which I wholly believe to be true).

Since I first saw the reports of discarded doses I've noticed what was omitted, which is how they are disposing of the unused doses, not a single report has mentioned "properly disposed of" or anything like it.

Also there is no mention of a booming incinerator disposal industry, which would be certainly possible given the huge amount of unused vac-seens and also needed to deal with all the medical waste generated by all the people hospitalized by the wooo-han flu and injured by vac-seens. Were the vac-seens properly disposed of, some probably were, others, likely not. Will more train derailments be needed since they now have a way to burn up a lot of harmful chemicals?

I don't think the Ohio incident was used to burn unused vac-seens, but a similar incident in the future could be used to dispose of them.

As the Dems like to repeat "never let a crisis go to waste"

Expand full comment

take the jab..............pay the price

Expand full comment

I seriously doubt there will be an admission to 250 million wasted doses. More likely they'll just sweep them under the rug. Just watch where you step.

Expand full comment

If you add in 16k permanently disabled and use the conservative Columbia U URF of 20, that = 330k dead or PD

Expand full comment
author

Could you provide a link to the Colombia U URF of 20 please?

I will include it in work like this going forward.

https://peterhalligan.substack.com/p/refresher-on-the-under-reporting Factor (URF) – The Giant Syringe in the Room

Expand full comment
Feb 21, 2023Liked by Peter Halligan
author

Many thanks.

Quick reaction.

Not yet peer reviewed or should I say, "checked against the narrative".

Dated October 2021 - covering data from Feb to August 2021?

Administered doses were 370 million at 31 August 2021

https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/covid-vaccine-doses-by-manufacturer

Will check it out later.

Many thanks!

Expand full comment
Feb 21, 2023Liked by Peter Halligan

I am so happy I did not get the Jab.

Expand full comment

There's your tightening work force.

Expand full comment

If VAERS is only 1%, then the real number of deaths from this "vaxxine" 1.7 million in the United States alone, so far

Expand full comment
author

https://peterhalligan.substack.com/p/refresher-on-the-under-reporting Factor (URF) – The Giant Syringe in the Room

one in 100 = Lazarus Report. There are three other methods (which build on many more factors) in that link.

Expand full comment
Feb 21, 2023Liked by Peter Halligan

Hmm, the VAERS death count was 29,000 less than a year ago, & that was after thousands of cases has mysteriously disappeared. WE CANNOT TRUST THE GOVERNMENT'S NUMBERS. THEY ARE FAR WORSE. Before these numbers reversed, a Harvard study said only 1% of adverse effects are reported to VAERS. Try 3M Americans killed. BTW, FDA terminated the experimental vaccine for 2009 H1N1 Swine Flu pandemic after 53 deaths. What is the difference now?

Expand full comment
author

The difference now is that the FDA/CDC hire outside contractors to deal with all the pesky paperwork required to follow-up VAERS reports.

https://peterhalligan.substack.com/p/from-the-wtf-files-cdc-paid-outside contractors 40 million bucks to process VAERS reports – 9 million BEFORE the C19 mRNA injections were granted EUA

Expand full comment

I have noticed that Bourla and Gates have not died suddenly. Did they forget to take their own poison? Or was it just for everyone else. Asking for a friend.

Expand full comment

Either they received a placebo dose or a totally fake jab - like Biden & Harris...Brighteon published news videos that someone had zoomed in & slowed down enough to see that Biden & Harris DID NOT receive injections. At a minimum, this means they knew how harmful this military AI nanoweapon in the form of a biosynthetic parasite aka "vaccine" really is.

Expand full comment

Thank you PH. Factoring in as you so clearly explain, the under reporting figure.

The deaths are shocking. Then we get to the horrendous number of injured.

Know this as fact. Every single one of those injured, to whatever degree. Have had their natural life span reduced by the injections.

The end result is exactly what the evil empire required. Population reduction.

Expand full comment
author

Yes. An analogy might be that the injections reduce your immune system capability by 25-30% of its remaining efficacy. If you have no immune system, you may not die today or tomorrow or next year - it depends on what infections and diseases you pick up that will kill you.

There are around 16 to 20 times the number of injuries reported as deaths. I am guessing that the URF for the "minefields" from the Giant Syringe in the Room are, as you say, present in everyone injected - waiting for that footstep that triggers the explosion.

Expand full comment

True... also true is the fact that micro-clotting takes time to get to the point where they become aggregated large clots and cause heart attacks, PE's or strokes... and let's not forget turbo-cancers... this Rodeo is just beginning... the next 12 months should be surreal.

Expand full comment

Yes I am seeing some of the early signs, leukemia, multiple sclerosis, turbo cancer in several people I am aquatinted with and took the jabs. These are folks in their 40s. I have yet to know anyone who died with Covid let alone from it.

Expand full comment

Hello, Peter, Question:

Is there a way to access ALL the pertinent taxpayer-funded CDC data re: the vaccinated vs unvaccinated? Data to include: date vax'd, date hospitalized, date died, and cause.

I understand each state tracks this data, but so far, none of the states have released this patient-level data (names would be blacked out, of course). Can't any of this public health data be released via FOIA? On what grounds could such a FOIA request be refused?

Once we have patient-level data, I think the story of this deliberate Pfizer funded, CDC/FDA/DOD enabled holocaust will become crystal clear. And thank you for your work, sir, this is my first time on your substack!

Expand full comment
author

There is a bunch of data on the CDC web site. Unfortunately a correlation of unvaxxed, vaxx status (one, two, or boosted once, twice, 3 times, dates of vaxxes and date of death is not available. Neither does it exist on the EUDRA system.

Neither is there any data on "death with Remdesivir present" or "level of hydration and nourishment at time of death" and so on.

CHeck out Steve Kirsch's SubStack for his "4 question" approach to settle the issue.

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/now-everyone-can-easily-prove-the vax should be stopped

"I'll describe how you can ask just FOUR questions about people who died since 2020 and you will see for yourself why the vaccines should be stopped.

1. Age

2. Whether they were vaccinated with the COVID vaccine

3. Year of death

4. Causes of death

That subset of my survey is all you need."

Expand full comment

Thanks, Peter! Great stuff, thanks for your work.

Expand full comment
author

You are welcome and check out the latest post about the UK. the injections never protected the most vulnerable - all a lie - prioritizing the elderly was a murderous fool's errand.

Expand full comment

Dear Peter, I am currently writing Part 1 of a 6-part series comparing the Holocaust with the Covid-19 Pandemic. Apart from the Denis Rancourt study (Age-stratified COVID-19 vaccine-dose fatality rate for Israel and Australia, https://correlation-canada.org/report-age-stratified-covid-19-vaccine-dose-fatality-rate-for-israel-and-australia/) do you know of any other credible global death figures estimates attributable to the Covid-19 vaccinations? Thanks in advance.

Expand full comment
author

PS

The other way to reconcile the data is to examine global excess deaths - you can build this from the EU's 444 million people - the US 335 million (around 560,000 per annum) and other countries with data.

Take the 2022 data alone and correlate that with doses per million over 2022 - the year where pretty well every country was double doses.

I believe that global deaths track around 56 million (half of births) - so an excess death number of 25% is 14 million.

Germany - excess mortality is close to 40%

Expand full comment

Thanks again. By the way, I tried the link you sent me for the VAERS data for Canada with a search for Pfizer (VAC), but it produced no result; so, I think this is either not up-to-date or doesn't properly track it.

I used another site: CANADA VAERS: Canadian Adverse Events Following Immunization Surveillance System (CAEFISS), URL: https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/immunization/canadian-adverse-events-following-immunization-surveillance-system-caefiss.html#acovid) selecting 'Reported side effects following COVID-19 vaccination in Canada', https://health-infobase.canada.ca/covid-19/vaccine-safety/#specialInterest and 'Adverse events of special interest, safety signals, and deaths,', but it only renders:

"Up to and including February 3, 2023, a total of 419 reports with an outcome of death were reported following vaccination"

which is a bit of a joke, quite unbelievable.

So, there's either some dishonesty going on, or an extremely poor/lacking reporting of deaths for this so-called reporting system.

Expand full comment
author

For Canada VAERS the link

https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/drugs-health-products/medeffect-canada/adverse-reaction-database.html

Takes me to a splash page that begins this:

"Canada Vigilance adverse reaction online database

Guides and help

Instructions for using the database

Glossary of database terms"

..lots of other stuff, then

"Alternative Access to Data - Data Extract Files.."

and so on

Expand full comment

Yep, that's the one I had tried. Nothing comes up for the Pfizer Vax. If you have any success, can you take a screenshot?

BTW, this morning without even looking I stumbled upon the following, seemingly quite good, data sets for the U.S. (based on original CDC data):

- USA: Weekly Excess Death Rate Analysis

https://phinancetechnologies.com/HumanityProjects/Weekly%20Excess%20Death%20Rate%20Analysis%20-%20US.htm

(first taken from Phinance Technologies - US Disability Data Part 4 - Relation with Excess Deaths

https://phinancetechnologies.com/HumanityProjects/US%20Disabilities%20-%20Part4.htm)

It looks pretty robust. If you play around with the settings and choose "Absolute Numbers" and then for 'Age group' choose Total you get a nice graph that shows about the following Excess Deaths:

Specifically: https://phinancetechnologies.com/HumanityProjects/Weekly%20Excess%20Death%20Rate%20Analysis%20-%20US.htm#Nav_ExcessMortality_vs_Vax

2020: 453,625 (15.64%)

2021: 514,552 (18%)

2022: 223,785 (7.55%)

Do these seem about right to you?

Expand full comment
author

All about "base portfolio" data used to compare (with population estimates) and data completeness - do we use 2010-2019 as base data from which to extrapolate to 2020-2022, or 2015-2019 or, for ease, use 2018-2019 as the "base portfolio" and assume any enhancements are within an acceptable R squared?

As an aside - what could be done about 3-4 million illegal immigrants crossing the southern border? Is anything possible as the "pee in the pool" of clean data?

Here's my crack at US excess deaths for those three 2020, 2021 and 2022 years using that well worn back of the envelope technique.

https://peterhalligan.substack.com/p/preliminary-us-mortality-for-2022 indicates that around 560,000 more Americans are dying every year compared to 2018-2019

So, I think the 2022 excess deaths are several hundred thousand light.

A reconciliation of the timing of doses given to excess mortality - cross referenced to VAERS is needed - either "raw" or "cooked" with a URF.

Dowd's team (= Humanity Project?) are smart cookies, with lots of computer power. To get to the global numbers we need the equivalent in India and China at least since these countries have each administered 3 times the number of injections as the US..

I have been waiting to analyse excess deaths in my "raw" method by getting the last dregs of data for 2022 from here: WONDER Message (cdc.gov)

I also want to get to cause of death trends as I believe that these need to be restated from the "lies of false attribution".

Once we get done with excess deaths, we can move on to "excess morbidities" using similar methods. These will kill for decades, removing billions of life years from Americans - they are around 16 times more of these reported as deaths on VAERS and a staggering 100 times as frequently reported to EUDRA (half of these "serious = life threaening as opposed to "severe" = life altering.

Expand full comment

Thanks again Peter. I have to admit a lot of this is way beyond my pay grade. So, I'll have to cautiously refrain from citing different numbers, so as to not make a fool of myself. But am glad to know you and others are up to these very challenging tasks. Thanks again for your kind time. I send you a nice cold virtual beer or drink of your choice!

Expand full comment
author

Hi Dan,

Unfortunately in this imperfect world, there is no such source. We have to estimate and extrapolate. I saw Denis' rate of a mortality rate of around one in 1,000 doses = one in 500 for the usual double dosed per country.

No particular work has been done on the relative lethality per manufacturer.

I have attempted to integrate the work done by others on the Under Reporting Factor for (US only) VAERS data - where mRNA injections were dominant.

Elsewhere, viral vector C19 injections were used - in Europe and especially in India. We have no data on the billions of doses administered in China using a "traditional" vaccine.

In a perfect world, there would be a huge effort to accurately measure adverse events in countries like Argentina where all the different types of C19 injections were rolled out.

The OxfordAstra Zeneca C19 injection has been withdrawn from most countries but still accounts for 80% of injections in India licensed to the Serum Institute.

Denis did some work there also over the Spring of 2021.

https://peterhalligan.substack.com/p/did-the-roll-out-of-approximately 350 million doses in India between April-July 2021 cause 3.7 million deaths?

This can be viewed in the context of the frequency of reporting of deaths and adverse events to the EUDRA system referred to here:

https://peterhalligan.substack.com/p/eudra-shows-4-5-times-more-deaths and adverse events reported per million doses for viral vector C19 "vaccines" compared to mRNA C19 "vaccines"

Although Denis' work results in the same estimate of deaths - using the 1 death per thousand doses for the 670 million doses administered in the US of around 670,000 dead - and applying an Under-Reporting Factor of 40 to the 16,903 deaths reported to VAERS = 676,120, it does not prove that Denis's method or applying a URF is correct.

Here is a description of different URF's.

https://peterhalligan.substack.com/p/refresher-on-the-under-reporting factor

In my opinion, the Oxford/Astra Zeneca viral vector injection is at least twice as deadly as the mRNA injection. That is an opinion. Australia made wide use of AZN and has a breakdown by manufacturer of adverse events - https://apps.tga.gov.au/Prod/daen/daen-entry.aspx - I have not examined Denis's work closely to test for any URF.

Other countries have their own adverse event reporting systems -

https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/drugs-health-products/medeffect-canada/adverse-reaction-database.html

https://yellowcard.mhra.gov.uk/

https://www.medsafe.govt.nz/COVID-19/safety-report-44.asp

The good people at VaccineImpact produced this with data up through 12 November 2022.

https://vaccineimpact.com/2022/48817-dead-and-5107883-injured-following-covid-19-vaccines-in-european-database-of-adverse-reactions/

I have ball-parked a number based on a URF of 40 applied to the sum of US + EU dead reported to VAERS + EUDRA. - that is 16,903 + 48,817 times 40 for around 2.1 billion EU + US doses administered out of 13.29 billion doses administered globally.

https://ourworldindata.org/covid-vaccinations

65,720 EU + US dead times a URF of 40 times 13.29/2.1 billion doses to globalize = 16.6 million dead globally.

Factor in the increased lethality of Oxford/AstraZeneca in India?

https://peterhalligan.substack.com/p/has-india-the-worlds-largest-manufacturer of vaccines – suffered the world’s largest number of “vaccine” deaths numbering around 20 million?

Who knows.

I hope this helps and please do let me know if you can improve on estimation and extrapolation methods used!

I believe this is conservative, because contacts have told me the URF in Europe is closer to 70 than 40.

I also believe that if the Chinese traditional vaccines were safer, there would be a lot more propaganda coming from there.

Lastly, I think that the URF is increasing the more remote from the last injection. We see the now only the impact of a much diminished take up of bi-valent mRNA injections in the US. They failed the clinical trials, they failed "in vivo" and have failed as a "product" that is not moving at the "speed of science".

I am conscious that medics globally have been reported as pushing back on any claims. Does this mean

Expand full comment