Question: If 670 million injections cause 1 million adverse events, how many adverse events would 6.2 billion injections cause? According to reports to VAERS – not 9.6 million but just 600,00
Question: If 670 million injections cause 1 million adverse events, how many adverse events would 6.2 billion injections cause? According to reports to VAERS – not 9.6 million but just 600,00
Has anyone got an explanation for this “anomaly”? A few days ago, I posted this: (100) Based on rates of adverse events and deaths for the US section of VAERS, non-US adverse events should be 8 million and deaths should be 150,000 – this lifts AE's to 9 million and deaths to 168.500 (substack.com)
I know of several people, either dead from sudden rare cancers, or ones who were in remission, plus several more with new or exacerbated autoimmune diseases. None knew of the adverse events supposedly being looked out for, apart from the "very rare" myocarditis or blood clot and I should think, neither did GPs. Also, if they were over a certain age and the ailment manifested weeks or months after, they or the doc would not assume any correlation. One friend experiencing fluctuating BP asked hospital docs if it could be related to jabs, this was quite recently, and she was told no. I unearthed studies from her type of illness that had 900 reported in VAERS. As far as I am aware, none of these 11 people had submitted a report, nor docs attending them. Just thought of 3 more, 2 skin cancers and sudden dementia onset!
I tried to report adverse events to VAERS and finally gave up as it is too complicated. I'm sure that is done for a reason. If many reports are NOT being entered in the US, you can be sure that many more are not being entered in foreign countries.
Yes, On the face of it VAERS is 9 million adverse events light and 100,000 deaths from outside the US.
Would 10 million adverse events and 130,000 deaths in total (US plus ex-US) make a difference in the narrative or the attitude of the FDA/CDC/WHO?
If these numbers were adjusted for a URF of 40, that would be irrefutable evidence of more harm than good ,compared to the hospitalization and mortality rates of the Omicoron variant.
I saw a brief video from WHO woman today saying Covid not over as they don't yet know long term effects of being infected, such as heart and other vascular probs. Anyone might assume they anticipate this, after infection along with all the new cancer cases they are predicting too! My guess on FDA or others halting them is no.
estimates are anywhere from one in 40 to less than 1 in 100 adverse events actually get reported to VAERS. Study done in early 2000's (before covid) found that 1 person in 38 experienced a significant vax injury and less than 1 in 100 actually got reported to VAERS.
Even if the 9 million adverse events that would pro-rata the US adverse event incidence rate = they would still need to be adjusted for the UrF of around 49 for all types of adverse event from severe (life altering) through serious) (life threatening) ad death.
People wouldn't be inclined to report minor injuries so the majoirty of adverse events on VAERS are major.
The futher from last vaxx date, the less likely to associate harm to the vaxx ,increasing the UrF
Also. Dr Peter McCullough has suggested that even a sore arm can be an indicator of harm, further down the road,
Just have to wait for an analysis of the free text fiields in V-Safe for fresh evidence of harm rates.
VAERS is a crap system. Doctors hate it because it takes 30 to 45 minutes to input the data for one injury/death. Many doctors had not even heard of VAERS prior to covid, so it was just not being used. Since the covid shots, many doctors don't want to report a vax injury. So most injuries from the covid injections are not being reported to VAERS
I know of several people, either dead from sudden rare cancers, or ones who were in remission, plus several more with new or exacerbated autoimmune diseases. None knew of the adverse events supposedly being looked out for, apart from the "very rare" myocarditis or blood clot and I should think, neither did GPs. Also, if they were over a certain age and the ailment manifested weeks or months after, they or the doc would not assume any correlation. One friend experiencing fluctuating BP asked hospital docs if it could be related to jabs, this was quite recently, and she was told no. I unearthed studies from her type of illness that had 900 reported in VAERS. As far as I am aware, none of these 11 people had submitted a report, nor docs attending them. Just thought of 3 more, 2 skin cancers and sudden dementia onset!
I tried to report adverse events to VAERS and finally gave up as it is too complicated. I'm sure that is done for a reason. If many reports are NOT being entered in the US, you can be sure that many more are not being entered in foreign countries.
Yes, On the face of it VAERS is 9 million adverse events light and 100,000 deaths from outside the US.
Would 10 million adverse events and 130,000 deaths in total (US plus ex-US) make a difference in the narrative or the attitude of the FDA/CDC/WHO?
If these numbers were adjusted for a URF of 40, that would be irrefutable evidence of more harm than good ,compared to the hospitalization and mortality rates of the Omicoron variant.
I saw a brief video from WHO woman today saying Covid not over as they don't yet know long term effects of being infected, such as heart and other vascular probs. Anyone might assume they anticipate this, after infection along with all the new cancer cases they are predicting too! My guess on FDA or others halting them is no.
It will not be long before the WHO et al claim the vacx damage = long C19
WHO database lists over 5 million adverse drug reactions for Pfizer globally alone.
https://www.vigiaccess.org/
Point is, harms outside the US caused by US vaxx makers are supposed to be reported to VAERS in the US.
Perhaps 9 million overseas adverse events haven't been - and that's before the under-reprting in the US is even reflected.
The casualties from this bioweapon jab are much higher than anyone is reporting. And they will continue to skyrocket from here. This is sickening.
estimates are anywhere from one in 40 to less than 1 in 100 adverse events actually get reported to VAERS. Study done in early 2000's (before covid) found that 1 person in 38 experienced a significant vax injury and less than 1 in 100 actually got reported to VAERS.
Yes. Lots of ways to estimate the URF.
https://peterhalligan.substack.com/p/refresher-on-the-under-reporting
Even if the 9 million adverse events that would pro-rata the US adverse event incidence rate = they would still need to be adjusted for the UrF of around 49 for all types of adverse event from severe (life altering) through serious) (life threatening) ad death.
People wouldn't be inclined to report minor injuries so the majoirty of adverse events on VAERS are major.
The futher from last vaxx date, the less likely to associate harm to the vaxx ,increasing the UrF
Also. Dr Peter McCullough has suggested that even a sore arm can be an indicator of harm, further down the road,
Just have to wait for an analysis of the free text fiields in V-Safe for fresh evidence of harm rates.
https://peterhalligan.substack.com/p/a-side-by-side-comparison-of-v-safe
VAERS is a crap system. Doctors hate it because it takes 30 to 45 minutes to input the data for one injury/death. Many doctors had not even heard of VAERS prior to covid, so it was just not being used. Since the covid shots, many doctors don't want to report a vax injury. So most injuries from the covid injections are not being reported to VAERS
Same as everything else..
Believe me. Not your lying eyes.